<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

<title>White America All Entries</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/articles/articles/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>

<channel>
<title>White America All Entries Feed</title>

<item>
<title>The Irrelevance of Ethnic Genetic Interests (Article)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Articles/Articles/the_irrelevance_of_ethnic_genetic_interests/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Why sacrificing yourself for your race is never rational.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2010-02-12T15:57:12-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Kevin MacDonald is Still Confused (Blog)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/kevin_macdonald_is_still_confused/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In reading Kevin MacDonald’s <a href="http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=216" title="response">response</a> to <a href="http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/blog/blog/kevin_macdonald_is_confused_about_ethnic_altruism/" title="my last blog post about ethnic altruism">my last blog post about ethnic altruism</a>, I realized that whole debate between us is probably due to MacDonald’s misunderstanding of the thesis of my article “<a href="http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/articles/articles/the_ethnic_nepotism_fallacy/" title="The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy">The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy</a>.” MacDonald seems to think that my sole object of criticism in that article was genetic similarity theory (GST). However, it was not. What I mean by an ethnic nepotism theory is any theory that supposes that people evolved to direct altruism at co-ethnics because of relatedness. The question of which psychological mechanisms are responsible for this altruism is irrelevant. Thus, my critique applies to MacDonald’s theory of ethnicity if he believes that people instinctually direct altruism at co-ethnics through what he calls “social identity mechanisms” like ethnocentrism and collectivism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-12-21T13:10:27-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Kevin MacDonald is Confused About Ethnic Altruism (Blog)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/kevin_macdonald_is_confused_about_ethnic_altruism/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=158" title="post on The Occidental Observer Blog">post</a> on <em>The Occidental Observer Blog</em>, Kevin MacDonald claims that I misinterpreted his theory of ethnicity in my article “<a href=" http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/articles/articles/the_ethnic_nepotism_fallacy/" title="The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy">The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy</a>.” I attributed to ethnic nepotism theory partisans, including MacDonald, the belief that relatedness within ethnies creates altruism among co-ethnics, or “ethnic altruism.” MacDonald responds that he rejected the idea of ethnic altruism in “<a href="http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/PLS2001-3-067.pdf" title="An Integrated Evolutionary Perspective on Ethnicity">An Integrated Evolutionary Perspective on Ethnicity</a>” (“Evolutionary Perspective”). Rather, he thinks co-ethnic relations are characterized by reciprocity, rather than the unreciprocated altruism that one finds among kin.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-12-18T12:08:03-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Kevin MacDonald responds to &#8220;The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy&#8221; (Blog)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/kevin_macdonald_responds_to_the_ethnic_nepotism_fallacy/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin MacDonald has <a href="http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=158" title="just responded">just responded</a> to "<a href="http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/articles/articles/the_ethnic_nepotism_fallacy/">The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy</a>," my last article. Expect my response in the next couple of days.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-12-15T19:58:12-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Ethnic Nepotism Fallacy (Article)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Articles/Articles/the_ethnic_nepotism_fallacy/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The ethnic bond and the family bond have different sources and natures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-12-11T16:28:43-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Duncan Hengest on the Fort Hood Massacre (Blog)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/duncan_hengest_on_the_fort_hood_massacre/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Having served as a military officer and written about race in the army, I’ve decided to add my two cents to the discussion on the massacre at Fort Hood in which a Muslim, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, killed 13 people. The incident brings home the point I made in "<a href="http://www.amren.com/ar/2008/01/index.html#cover" title="Diversity in the Army">Diversity in the Army</a>," published in <em>American Renaissance</em>: “America now fights its wars in the Third World, and our policy of putting Third World people in the military is dangerous.” I explicitly warned against the possibility that a Third World soldier, who sided with America’s enemies due to his ethnic origins, would commit a deadly act against his fellows in arms. As far as I know, no high-ranking officer has read the article and certainly none has acted on its suggestions. Had anyone done so, perhaps the massacre would have been prevented.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-11-06T17:28:42-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Citizen Competence and Conditional Rights (Article)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Articles/Articles/citizen_competence_and_conditional_rights/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Rights should be granted only to citizens who can be trusted to exercise them responsibly.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-10-08T15:56:14-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why Be Just? (Article)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Articles/Articles/why_be_just/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Rawlsians believe that behaving justly and morally is in our enlightened self-interest.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-08-28T17:46:35-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jason Richwine on IQ, Immigration, and Social Capital (Blog)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/jason_richwine_on_iq_immigration_and_social_capital/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A new scholar who is doing interesting work is <a href="http://www.aei.org/aei-website/managed-content/site-pages/national-research-initiative/nri-fellows-1.html" title="Jason Richwine">Jason Richwine</a>, a recent PhD graduate from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. As the AEI website informs us, Richwine’s area of specialization is the link between intelligence and public policy issues, including immigration. Richwine began publishing articles in current affairs magazines and websites this year. Although he never adopts an explicitly pro-white perspective, all of his articles have brought attention to topics that are crucial to this website: racial differences in intelligence, the failure of Hispanics to integrate into American society, and the relationship of intelligence to social and economic success.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-08-19T16:21:11-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Logic of Liberalism (Article)</title>
<link>http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Articles/Articles/the_logic_behind_liberalism/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The work of John Rawls shows that liberalism is not as crazy as it appears.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:date>2009-07-30T16:30:28-06:00</dc:date>
</item>

    
</channel>
</rss>