“Freedom of speech is like a plague!“
By • 2/15/08 |
Drives Muslims crazy. |
I’ve recommended that white preservationists present themselves as the true liberals, that is, as protectors of Western values like individualism, pluralism, and tolerance. Events in Denmark today show the power that such a position could potentially have. Today all the major Danish newspapers reprinted one of the Muhammad cartoons that set off riots in 2005 (shown at the right) as a sign of solidarity with its artist, Kurt Westergaard, who was the object of a recently thwarted Muslim assassination plot. The conflicts surrounding the cartoons have been highly effective in instilling in Danes a sense of national pride and unity because they revealed Muslims as a threat to Western freedoms. This sense of ethnic solidarity is evident in the comments of Danish Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen on the plot to assassinate Westergaard: “Unfortunately, the matter shows that there are in Denmark groups of extremists that do not acknowledge and respect the principles on which Danish democracy is built. In Denmark we have freedom not only to think and talk, but also to draw.”
The cartoons provoked Muslims once again to show their fundamentally alien spirit:
Protestors marched in the capital’s streets shouting “God is Great!” and “Freedom of speech is like a plague!”
There you have it: Muslims regard our values as a plague. As soon as we assert them unapologetically, they start ranting about establishing a caliphate and rioting.
There is an important lesson here. If you talk about racial differences in IQ, whites will think you’re probably a Nazi. If you tell them racial solidarity is a natural human instinct, they’ll be totally sure you’re a Nazi. If you talk about racial differences in crime rates, they’ll talk about spending money on programs for underprivileged children; crime isn’t an issue for most powerful whites anyway, as they can afford to insulate themselves from it. But if you show whites that non-whites threaten core Western values like freedom of speech and democracy, then they well might start thinking, “We’ve got to stand up to these people!” And there we have the beginnings of a mass white preservationist movement.
If you want this article to be exposed to a wide audience, take the time to recommend it at digg. Millions of readers traffic the site, and the more recommendations an article gets, the better its chance of being read. If you don't have digg account yet, registration is easy. Just click submit to get started. |
Click here to join the White America mailing list. You'll get an e-mail notice whenever White America publishes new entries.
The whites you fear to be immune to appeals to kinship group loyalty would just as fiercely resist the idea that non-whites have any innate traits, especially negative ones. And arguably being a monstrous existential threat to freedom and our way of life is a far more negative way to portray a group than to say it is less intelligent and self-disciplined.
Just as whites cling to the history and myth of past non-WASP white immigration and assimilation to justify non-white immigration today, so they will talk of Catholics and Know-Nothings now, either to pooh-pooh the notion that Muslims (for instance) are a threat at all, or to claim that they will be assimilated and brought into the fold just as Catholics were.
With their strenuous efforts to get their kids into the best schools and most stimulating and impressive activities, whites understand family love and loyalty very well.
I think that a pro-white, race realist group that clearly, proactively, and consistently repudiated Nazi-ism and had a visible (but not necessarily overwhelming) Jewish component would be able to reach whites without the baggage AR has.
I think the best way to make the cultural argument against immigration is to point out that non-white immigrants overwhelmingly vote for left-wing parties.
For example, illegal aliens in America would vote for Democrats 80-20 after amnesty. Some mainstream GOP strategists are arguing that the party should thus be against amnesty and increased legal immigration.
Tens of millions of Americans would agree that the the Democratic Party is a threat to freedom of speech and other Western values. The Democrats depend on the immigrant vote to realize their radical agenda.
We SHOULD be the protectors of Western values, because that would mean we protect and support OUR values. Western man has become so obsessed with 2 longstanding Western traits:
1st, of exploring other cultures and looking for the value/positive in them,
and, 2nd, of trying to be fair and egaltarian, to give all a fair chance,……
that we have gone overboard on these ideals that were fine in moderation. The combination of the 2 carried to extrapolated heights of insanity are so very largely responsible for the modern Western man’s disowning of his heritage, his leadership legasy, and even his very basic culture that all others are entitled to.
“West is bad— Must give in to Islam, otherwise I am unfair and bigoted!”