Why I Started This Website
By • 12/10/06 |
We will speak out against him. |
White America is a website devoted to refuting the “whites as cancer” myth and promoting race realism and white activism. (For more on this, see our first feature.) I have long been active in the American race realist movement, and I have thought about it deeply. I started this website because I came to believe that none of the existing publications that promote white racial interests would ever do so effectively. I have many reasons for believing this, but the primary one is that all of them are too accommodating to the radical anti-Semitism that pervades the American racial right.
I first became interested in race realism and white activism through the work of writers like Charles Murray, J. P. Rushton, and Jared Taylor. In the early days, I was a passionate devotee of Jared Taylor’s magazine American Renaissance (American Renaissance). Here I found solid and well-supported arguments for the reality of racial differences and the need to maintain a white majority in the West. The combination of astounding audacity and unimpeachable rationality in the articles made a true believer of me. Also, the magazine was free of anti-Semitism; indeed, Taylor never dealt with Jews at all. Consequently, I eagerly sought out other subscribers to American Renaissance in my area.
It was then that my disillusionment began. I had expected my new acquaintances to constitute a secret community of realism in which I could take refuge from the delusions of the world I lived in. What I found was very different. At least half, and probably the majority, of these people were even more deluded than the typical racially unaware American. The real core of their beliefs was not the ideas of Taylor or Rushton, but those of David Duke and Kevin Alfred Strom. They subscribed to what I call the “theology of Jewish evil,” which sees the Jewish people as a sort of cosmic villain constantly conspiring against the white race.
When I first met these people, things would start out well. We would talk about IQ differences, minority crime and social dysfunction, and the importance of preserving a white majority in the West. However, eventually their anti-Semitism would emerge. It was because of Jewish malice towards whites that the borders had been opened, and the all-powerful “Israel Lobby” was getting white boys shot up in Iraq. Soon, they would be telling you that the Holocaust was a hoax and the Nuremburg trials a scam; Israel was a criminal state that constantly committed atrocities against Palestinians, and suicide-bombers were freedom-fighters. Indeed, it would be no surprise if Sharon and the Mossad really were behind the 9/11 attacks. When I challenged them on any of this stuff, they would treat me at first with the tolerant condescension of the master for the novice. If I challenged them persistently and effectively, they came to view me as a “kosher conservative,” and avoided me. What depressed me even more was that I found these beliefs not just among uneducated, working-class American Renaissance subscribers, but also among affluent subscribers with advanced degrees who really should have known better.
Of course, no one should be immune from well-founded criticism, and it is certainly true that Jews have traditionally been very active in liberal causes and have indeed done a great deal to demonize white racial consciousness. But these people did not trade in well-founded criticism; rather, they were conspiracy theorists whose minds twisted everything they disliked about the present and past into evidence for Jewish evil.
I continued to believe that a community of realism must exist somewhere, and I went to the 2004 and 2006 American Renaissance conferences in search of it. I did meet some reasonable people there, and they have become my friends. But the views of most of the attendees were sadly familiar.
What finally shattered my belief in American Renaissance was a series of events that started at its last conference, which took place in February. Near the end of the conference, one of the speakers, Guillaume Faye, said, in a talk about the decline of the West, that Israel might soon get wiped off the map. He viewed the prospect of Israel’s destruction as one sign of Western cultural collapse, but that was not how the audience took it. Rather, there was a thunderous round of applause coming from at least half of the audience.
At the end of the talk, David Duke got up during the question and answer period and spun out a long-winded speech on the subject of Jews’ eternal enmity to the white race, accompanied by much sympathetic chuckling and egging on from the audience. Michael Hart, a Jewish American Renaissance subscriber, got up and yelled at Duke, “You’re a fucking Nazi, and you’re a disgrace to this conference!” Then he walked out. He, however, got no support. I think I was the only one who tentatively applauded—I ought to have been more confident.
After this, I was one of a number of like-minded American Renaissance subscribers who joined an email group whose purpose was to discuss what happened at the conference and what our reaction should be. Many of the people on the list argued that the fiasco was a result of Jared Taylor’s tacit toleration, and perhaps even support, of radical anti-Semitism. Many of the speakers that Jared Taylor had invited to the conferences, such as Paul Fromm, Joe Sobran, and Sam Dickson, had been active in the Holocaust denial movement.
Besides, some of Taylor’s own writings showed extreme anti-Israeli sentiment. After 9/11, Taylor had published an article on The Last Ditch, a radically anti-Semitic website, in which he placed the blame for the attacks squarely on Israel. Israeli military actions against Palestinian terrorists—which Taylor referred to as “revenge killings”—had incurred the well-deserved hatred of Arabs. The lesson of the attacks was simple: abandon support for the nation that Arabs saw as having been “carved out of the flesh of their Islamic kinsmen.” If the US launched a war on Islamic terrorism in response to 9/11, it would simply be a “war for Israel” and could even lead to a general campaign to “exterminate all Muslims.”
I was amazed by the crude one-sidedness and the tone of feverish exaggeration in this article, as well as the others that Taylor had published on The Last Ditch (see here and here), which also dealt with the Middle East. All of Taylor’s capacity for moral evaluation seemed to disappear when he wrote about this subject. For Taylor, there was a simple moral equivalence between Israel and Palestinian terrorists: one side simply killed the other, and that was that. However, there are clear moral differences and good reasons for America to be on Israel’s side. Israel has succeeded in creating a free, first-world society; neither the Palestinans, nor any other Arab country has proved itself capable of that. Israel has made efforts to reach a reasonable compromise with the Palestinians, which have all been answered by terror. Furthermore, Taylor referred to clashes between the Israeli army and terrorists as mere “revenge killings,” as if a state’s actions to defend itself were equivalent to a mafia vendetta. There was little reason to fear the US would launch a campaign to exterminate Muslims. Rather, the real prospect of genocide comes from the Muslim side of the conflict: Muslim spokesmen regularly express their wish to wipe Israel off the map. Besides, the lurid language that Taylor used when speaking of the US and Israel in these articles—“carved out of the flesh of their Islamic kinsmen,” the “Israeli tanks rolling through the rubble of Nablus or Ramallah,” America’s “grindingly brutal imposition of alien will upon” Iraqis—made it look as though the West was a greater enemy to freedom and human rights than Middle Eastern dictators and Islamic fundamentalists were.
I pointed out to the group something that had long disturbed me: the American Renaissance links page links to the American Nationalist Union website. Run by Don Wassall, the ANU is a purveyor of the zaniest anti-Semitic propaganda. The editors of the site plainly view the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a long-discredited hoax, as a real historical document in which powerful Jews outlined their plan for the conquest of the world. The site also peddles conspiracy theories about the Skull & Bones Society, the Rothschilds, Freemasons, and God knows what else. I had long been astonished that American Renaissance would promote this kind of nonsense.
Even then, however, we still had hopes for American Renaissance. Eventually the group drafted a letter urging Taylor to write an article in the pages of American Renaissance that condemned the audience at the conference for applauding the destruction of Israel and rejected the beliefs of Duke and his followers. We also asked him to stop inviting anti-Semites to speak at American Renaissance conferences. The tone of the letter was tough and angry, but we had a right to this tone.
We were pessimistic about the outcome, but Taylor’s reaction exceeded our worst fears. In April, he published an article called “Jews and American Renaissance” on what had happened at the conference. Although he criticized some of the attendees for treating Jews at the conference rudely, Taylor said nothing about the audience’s behavior during Faye’s talk. While he called David Duke’s remarks inappropriate for the conference, he said nothing about their truth or falsity; he merely called Duke a man of “strong views”—really the understatement of the century for a man who has stated that he believes Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks. But the real shocker was that Taylor publicly insulted those of us who had written and signed the letter. He called it condescending and said it had not influenced him at all; we had made a “mistake” by writing it.
Let’s get this straight. For Taylor, it was not the people who cheered on genocide who needed to be taken to task; rather, we did for urging him to speak out against this behavior.
It was this article that finally convinced me my hopes in American Renaissance had been misplaced. Taylor would plainly never give up his collaboration with anti-Semites. While I will always respect American Renaissance as a great achievement and refer to it when it is useful, I have lost my faith in Jared Taylor’s ability to build a viable race realist community in America. And the same is true of the lesser white activist institutions in America, such as the Council of Conservative Citizens and the National Policy Institute. The CCC invited Dickson, Fromm, and Wassall to speak at their last conference. The NPI links to Wassall’s absurd ANU website.
Even if these organizations stopped inviting anti-Semites to speak at their conferences and took down all the offending links, it would still not be enough. Rather, it is incumbent on the leaders of the American race realist movement to speak out against anti-Semitic lies. This involves more than the superficial, insubstantial disavowals of anti-Semitism that one sometimes reads in race realist publications. It means spelling out in detail why the theology of Jewish evil is nonsense.
Few people will see the justice of our cause when so many of our supporters are so manifestly unbalanced. Also, allowing anti-Semitism to fester in our ranks gives the appearance of justice to those who wish to kill the race realist movement off. Consider how the Southern Poverty Law Center attacks American Renaissance:
“Jared Taylor is the cultivated, cosmopolitan face of white supremacy,” said Mark Potok, editor of Intelligence Report, the magazine of the Southern Poverty Law Center. “He is the guy who is providing the intellectual heft, in effect, to modern-day Klansmen.” Link
However unfair such a judgment is, one must admit that the SPLC is at least partly right since no race realists speak out against the theology of Jewish evil.
White America will remedy this failing as part of our larger project of establishing a mature race realist movement. In this way, we hope to establish at last the community of realism that I have long sought, and to help it thrive and grow.
If you want this article to be exposed to a wide audience, take the time to recommend it at digg. Millions of readers traffic the site, and the more recommendations an article gets, the better its chance of being read. If you don't have digg account yet, registration is easy. Just click submit to get started. |
Click here to join the White America mailing list. You'll get an e-mail notice whenever White America publishes new entries.
Mr Taylor has been a tremendous force for the good of white racial nationalism. I cannot think of any other Internet white nationalist presence that is as intelligently written, logical and powerful as amren.com
I have always held a skeptical attitude towards anti-Semitism. I find some of their arguments or theories totally implausible, such as the belief that the War in Iraq is an Israeli conspiracy. I’ve posted some of my views regarding the absurdity of today’s whacky anti-Semitic beliefs on right-wing political message-boards, and although I’ve received some criticism, there will be a few people who send a message to me, privately saying that they agree.
The Realist, I’d like to say that I admire what you’re doing. Our movement could go mainstream if we didn’t have a hard-core anti-Semitic entrenchment. Take a look at Britain: The BNP used to endorse anti-Semitism. But now that they’ve gotten rid of it, they’re accepted, although scorned by some, as a mainstream political force.
As Realist says in reply to Martin, “No one denied that JT had been a force for good. AR is still the best race realist magazine out there, alas!” It’s the “alas” that points to the problem.
Once the linkage of white-racialism and traditionalism with antisemitism is broken, many of my fellow Jews will open their minds to the truths that, for historical reasons, they now find threatening and unthinkable but who have noticed that with a few exceptions (such as View from the Right) it’s antisemites who propagate those truths. Understandably, then, they assume that they are presented with one indivisible package, to accept or reject in toto. Many non-Jews who abhor antisemitism but don’t yet see how that package can be unpacked will also (let us hope) abandon their reluctance to embrace the truths that they now shun.
If you fellows really believe in the validity and truth of what you are doing, particularly with respect to the Jewish issue, how about the challenge of open debate?
I propose the following: setting up some (neutral) internet forum, where the leading lights of these differing views can vigorously debate these issues: Hart vs. Duke, Auster vs. MacDonald, The Realist vs. Jared Taylor, etc.
Certainly, if “The Realist” can set up this fine site, he can pursue this other project. Or, if we wish to dispense with neutrality, you can just host the debates on this site, provided you hold to the promise of free speech and do not censor debator’s opinions with which you disagree.
Let the debates begin!
Alec—I knew I wasn’t the only one. That’s why I started this website.
Aileen—Exactly.
Skeptical—It’s a good idea. Maybe I’ll ask Lawrence Auster and Michael Hart if they’re interested.
I am not inclined to agree with you. You think people who don’t think 6 million Jews died in Europe in the World War Two period and believe that the various Jewish lobbies, including the Zionist ones have had a huge amount of bad influence in the Western world is some kind of cosmic anti-Jewish vitriolic hatred is idiotic. While, I agree some people may be in that realm I don’t think a lot of people are in that realm including a lot of people at the American Renaissance and definitely not at The Last Ditch. I know a few Jews who would fit in that category. The sad thing here is you are being irrational on this issue while being rational on the racial issue. When you talk about anti-semites being everyhwere and anti-semitism being around lots of Gentiles it seems you are the one in the loony conspiracy bin. Jews are smart and have a disproportionately bad influence on society in some ways and in other ways they are good. Jews, unlike the Chinese Buddhists have been kicked out of every White country for their lack of assimilation and hostility to gentile values and society. This isn’t a big secret. I wish you luck in your mission to expand racial awareness and realism, but do not get into this trap of “pinning the tail” on the proverbial ubiquitous anti-semite because you are acting like a leftist and it shows your irrational tendencies.
Mr. Ahuja—I don’t know whether I should respond to people who attribute to me views I never stated. I never said anti-Semites were everywhere, and I never said that all criticism of Jewish influence was anti-Semitic—in fact, I say the opposite in the article. I announced IW on Stormfront and someone there had a response similar to Mr. Ahuja’s. Here’s the link to the thread: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?p=3686428#post3686428. Here’s my last comment:
I am the Realist, who set up this website. Unlike American Renaissance, I would publish an article critical of Jewish influence on white societies provided it was intellectually defensible. “Intellectually defensible” means that the article would not contain unfounded slanders against Jews. Furthermore, any article that I published would have to concede that much of the commentary about Jews in the white nationalist community, including the whole of Holocaust denial, is sick and evil.
Lawrence Auster’s article “Why Jews Welcome Muslims” is an example of the sort of thing I would be glad to publish (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13894). Another is this entry on Auster’s blog View from the Right (http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/005793.html).
Auster has spelled out the differences between responsible and irresponsible criticism of Jews here (http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004562.html).
Are Jews the only ones allowed to critique Jews, and are they the ones who are to set the limits of discourse on the subject?
Kudos on the anti-anti-semitism (is there a better term for this?) stance. As an anti-anti-Semite myself, I’ve been put off by a number of posters to the AmRen site. True, many of the leading leftists threatening the well-being of our country are of Jewish ancestry – but they are leftist liberals, first and foremost, and that is the way that they should (and, indeed, must) be viewed. In fact, many of the worst-of-the-worst who act against the interests of white people are non-Jewish white’s. The Duke/Storm/Buchananites need to come to grips with that little tidbit of reality, and do so very quickly.
In defense of American Renaissance (www.amren.com, in case anyone didn’t already know), anti-Semitic remarks are the rare exception. And many of the outstanding regular posters are Jewish. Also absent at the AmRen site are the hateful calls to do harm to other races (as are so often supposed of white nationalist). And, for the most part, I’ve seldom seen white AmRen posters express anything other than their regrets for indignities, injustices, and harm suffered by others. This cannot be said of some of the non-white posters there, however.
Inverted World seems to me to offer a fresh new ground for many of the same discussions now occurring on AmRen – but with the clear idea that rational discussions will prevail, and that wild, unsupported theories will be shot down.
For that, I am grateful, and I look forward to being a part.
This sounds like a great website. I only recently discovered AR. Indeed, I’ve only begun exploring the white consciousness websites. I am happy to discover there is a community of like-minded citizens who think (that’s the key word) about race issues without the accepted social dogmas based on a lack of, or even reversal of, the actual facts.
I have never understood anti-semitism and have always found it an unnecessary - indeed, unwelcome - fixture in the white consciousness movement. Perhaps it’s because I was not raised in a religious household that I don’t care much about religion. And I just never understood how people can say Jews aren’t white - they’re often as white, blond, blue-eyed and fair as the whitest North European. They ARE of European geneology for the most part. But I think what most confused me and left me scratching my head is that Jews tend to score highest on many, if not all, of the measures of social responsibility by which we often assess the other races: IQ, work ethic, devotion to family and kin, lack of criminality and psychopathology, etc. For some reason, when it comes to Jews, many whites who, at all other times, analyze issues with pristine logic, become hyperbolic zealots. I just don’t get it.
And as for all these conspiracy theories that Jews are trying to take over the world, or are responsible for 9/11, can anyone point to any credible evidence whatsoever to support this startling claims? Again, let’s apply our critical faculties and ask: where’s the evidence? Is it credible? What conclusions can be extrapolated from the evidence? We in the race realist movement have the upperhand because we apply logic and reason to these issues. That should be no different when discussing the role and place of Jews in our society.
Bravo!! To be sure it is the numb skulled Jew haters like Duke et al that prevent white activism from gaining ground. Only fools accept their insane conspiracy theories as truth. I do believe that Mr. Taylor said of Jews once; “They look white to me.” Let’s not ever forget the courageous work of Levin and Hart in support of our cause.
Good luck with this project. I’ll certainly give you a chance. Reality trumps all ideology in my view, whether that means liberalism, conservatism, multiculturalism, nazism, communism, etc. As you point out there are many Jews who have played a role in the anti-white evil so rampant in our time. By the same token, there are several key Jews who played a role in developing the West as the pinnacle of human advancement. I am not Jewish but I do consider Jews part of the white race. I realize that many far-left Jewish ideologues and latter day Nazis dispute that but that’s how the reality appears to me.
I appreciate what Mr. Ahuja has said. I also appreciate the response from Realist.
I do hate having the “anti-Semite” label thrown at me when discussing subjects like Palestine, Iraq, or the Israeli lobby. If you say something, anything, critical you have to go through the process of explaining what your views aren’t.
I have learned to basically say that I don’t believe the Protocols are real and that my wife is Jewish before saying anything that could be taken as a knock against all Jews - especially since I’m pro-Israel. I just don’t always agree with this or that policy.
I guess it’s like when a person brings up the fact that they have black friends before talking about blacks to establish that they don’t hate blacks, but like everyone else feels about everyone else, they are concerned with certain present trends in regards to blacks.
I do this as well and mention my best friend is black in hopes to discuss the subject at hand instead of getting into whether or not I like to wear sheets and pointy hoods.
I believe that when there is a current expectation of one’s motives from what you say because, stereotypically, a certain type of person with certain views are normally the ones who say similar things; the responsibility, whether right or not, falls on you to explain where you stand on the larger issue at question.
In other words, anti-Semites have usually been the ones to bring up views critical of issues in regards to Jews. Fact is - fair or not, if you don’t want the label (though you could probably get it anyway as I have), you will have to be forthcoming about your feelings on the existence of a Jewish world conspiracy.
One other thing…
I wanted to wish you the best on this endeavor.
I applaud your motivation to guarantee that your publication is accurate and appreciate your desire to eschew superstition and grow above “scapegoating”.
I pray that you stay as safe as possible while still making a positive impact on a scene that desperately needs reason, mature discourse, and common sense. For the sake of peace between the races and the faiths. For Truth if nothing more.
Good luck, kind fortune, and God Speed.
I used to think the jewish conspiracy was bunk…now I know better.
Your adherence to the victim-jewish-ideology shows by quoting the SPLC and it’s propaganda against Jared Taylor, a good man with a true heart.
I get the impression from your article that you may be incapable of being objective about Jews, maybe because you yourself are Jewish, or maybe because you have been (like millions of Americans) brainwashed by the media. But I’ll assume I’m mistaken on that point for now.
The difference between you and many of the people you disagree with may well be that they have read things you haven’t read.
I suggest you read David Duke’s book, My Awakening, and Kevin MacDonald’ book, The Culture of Critique, from cover to cover. These 2 books are the essence of what you oppose. If you’re sure of your beliefs, you won’t be afraid to read the other side. When you’re finished, you’ll have really delved into he heart of your opponents’ beliefs, and you can confidently refute each point. Duke and MacDonald have millions of followers, so by specifically listing and correcting all of their errors, you could win many people to your point of view. But if you just say how horrible people are who don’t agree with you, and how it upset you, etc, that’s not very persuasive. You must show exactly what mistakes of fact or logic they are guilty of. This requires some effort, but it’s the only way to have any real impact.
Many people are terrified of these 2 books. They know that if they’re brilliant and compelling, reading them will necessitate a major alteration in one’s world view, and they’re right. But if they can’t read them, if they’re just so frightened they can only read a few sentences, then they won’t be taken seriously, and their opinions count for nothing.
What’s required is courage and hard work to actually have an impact in this situation. You need to learn a great deal, and then synthesize it all into a paper which lists and refutes their main points.
Incidentally, I used to have exactly the same opinion you have now, and when I read these 2 books, I was enthralled, and stunned. For me, they were a total revelation. They changed my life, and I know many other people who say the exact same thing. I’d also suggest Lindemann’s book, Esau’s Tears, and Israel Shakak’s book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion.
Your opinion will be worth something when it’s based on a thorough reading of both sides. If you’ve already read the books I suggest, then I’d be interested in reading your critiques.
I think a reckless, inaccurate generalization about any race is ridiculous. Blaming Jews as the only party responsible for the plight of Whites is actually dangerous because it creates blindness to the attacks launched by the other races.
Any historian will tell you that Jews are indeed an Asiatic people. There are plenty of exclusively Jewish organizations and publications. Those Whites who adopt a similar policy of exclusivity need not apologize.
Jews are not White. “White” is defined as coming from the original peoples who inhabited the European continent. Jews are Semites and therefore are not related to the original peoples of Europe. Just because someone’s skin is light, that doesn’t mean they are White. The closest genetic cousins of Jews are Arabs, not Nordics, Alpines, or Mediteranean stock.
Kevin McDonald is a tenured professor at California State University - Long Beach. He is the author of more than 100 scholarly papers and reviews, and he is the author of: A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy (1994), Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism (1998), and The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (1998).
These books to into excrutiating detail about the historical activity of Jews, with a special emphasis on their interaction with, influence on, and really, their complete hostility towards non-Jewish Western culture.
It is a matter of historical record, that Jews have worked diligently against the majority establishement in the West (so much so, that they now control much of that establishment). I won’t go into the litany here, but any reasonable person can investigate the key (not sole, but key) involvement of Jews in movements that have been disasterously destructive to Western Man (Bolshevism/Communism, Counter-Cultural revolution, Hollywood, Leftist politics in general, leftist academia, etc, etc, etc….).
So, your attempts, while they may be the efforts of a fair mind, or for that matter deliberate attempts at disinformation are…..quite simply…..wrong.
iHeretic
Purging anti-Semitism from the “movement” might be an easier task if the relationship between the World’s Only Superpower and the World’s Only Jewish State were not so curiously asymmetrical.
Think about it: on one side of the ledger we have the US providing massive amounts of financial aid and miltary technology transfers to Israel. On the orher side we have such items as the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty(does anyone still believe it was a mistake?), the Pollard case and the unauthorized transfer of some of the aforementioned military technology to Red China. Such a record would seem to conducive to engendering a certain amount of mistrust of Israel.
It is true that Jews do not = Israel, but it seems that the neocons and most official Jewish spokespersons are constantly telling us that anti-Zionism is simply disguised anti-Semitism.
You can’t change the past, but it might start to fade into the background somewhat if significant rightist forces in Israel moved toward developing cordial relations with non-anti-Semitic pro-white parties like the BNP and Vlams Belang. It also makes sense since those two parties are directing their main efforts against the growth of Muslim influence in Europe-giving them and the Israelis the same enemies. I think everyoone knows by now that the really dangerous anti-Semitism in Europe comes from Islam not the few remaining neo-nazis.
Nice start for a supposed “white nationalist” “truth” site, a crossed out image of David Duke, and NOT Murray Rothstein aka Sumner RedStone of MTV/CBS/Nickelodeon/Viacom. One’s responsible for poisoning tens of millions of white youth, and the other is attempting to fight it.
But, then again you link to Michelle Malkin, who is not white, but is a neocon race mixer married to a jew.
yawn.
And notice how “Moshe Stein” also would attack Duke for pointing out what Rothstein is doing. Sick.
My advice for conservative jews who feel a kinship with “white” people is to start up a vehemently anti- evil jew site immediately, and stop brushing under the rug a very large segment of your tribe, such as Sontag’s genocidal hatred for whites.
“Realist” writes that “the whole of Holocaust denial, is sick and evil.”
Really, the FACT that the plaque at Auschwitz changed from 4 million to 1.5 million, its sick and evil to point that out?
Should I be thrown into prison with the chemist and the elderly historians in our own countries for this? I find THAT to be sick and evil, and so does David Duke, who rightfully pointed this out.
Is this a religious organization because you have no grounding in reality, just your emotions.
I would have respect for jews if the “decent jews” stopped making excuses for the organized criminal aspect, the “mafia” if you will. And attacked these evil, evil, jews instead of Duke.
There is a defeaning silence on the part of “good jews” to denounce the actions of the others, actions, I might add, which caused them to be kicked out of every country they’ve ever been in.
Anti-semitism IS race realism.
To all Duke supporters:
It’s true I should back up my assertions with detailed arguments and facts. All in good time. This was an introductory column, meant to sketch out a large problem, not the place to delve into details.
Also, please read or re-read my previous post about what I said and didn’t say in this article.
Finally, let’s give this discussion some focus. In the article above, I link to an article of Duke’s posted on his website in which he states Israel was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Here’s the link again:
http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=5
Now, two questions:
Is the man who says this insane or isn’t he?
Is there a problem with a movement that takes this man as its leader?
Please just answer these two questions. Please nothing more about Hollywood, Jonathan Pollard, and the USS Liberty until they are answered.
Dear Awakened:
If you are a gentile married to a Jew, you are “finishing the job Hitler started” to quote a common Jewish proverb.
You are “loving the Jews to death” as other Torah-true Jews put it, by miscegenating with them and watering down their nation and tribe.
As true Jews (not the “neo-Christian” Reform and Reconstructionist Jews) pointed out when Vice-Presidential Candidate Joe Lieberman said he was not against miscegenation of Jews and non-Jews, the Jewish law is against miscegenation, and by pretending otherwise Joe is either lying to white America or lying to himself.
True Jews will continue to fight as they have for over 200 years to have the Christian heritage, religion, and culture removed from the village square or otherwise marginalized to the fringes of American life so they will not suffer defections of their children or miscegenation with gentiles.
True Jews will continue to measure America by the extent to which it (1) welcomes Jews from anywhere in any numbers and (2) continues to fight for Israel’s continued existence as a gentile-excluding country.
As far as Jews being white, what about the Ethiopian Jews, the Arabic Sephardic Jews, the Jews from India, or tribal Jews from the mountains of South America?
Jews are not pro-white because Jews are not white. They are an international trans-racial/trans-country tribe/organization/ethny with IQs that range from retarded (the Falash-Mura) to higher than white folks (the Ashkenazim) and skin colors that go from deepest black to brown to yellow to white.
For that reason, true Jews cannot support white nationalism. If they did, they would have to betray and deny their own kind, and that is a fundamental bedrock principle that Torah-true Jews—the only real Jews—are commanded never to do.
And finally, no criticism of Jewish behavior is permitted unless you agree that it is 100% a “legacy of anti-semitism”. At its root, all evil comes from white people, as Susan Sontag noted. I can assure you she did not consider herself, her family, her clan or her tribe to be a part of the “cancerous” white race she damned.
That being said, one of my favorite race-realists is Rabbi Kahane. He was an honest and honorable fighter for his people against all others.
I’d like to thank “Realist” for not censoring us and attempting to have an open debate.
David Duke is actually widely criticized for being far too soft on 9/11.
The evidence of foreknowledge is vast, proven, is simply a fact, it depends on how far you want to go with it. He doesn’t go any farther than Fox News did, because he has a doctorate, and has to prove and cite his facts.
This was courageously reported on in a four part series on Fox News, the neocon network.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bn74W9mx-1Y&mode=related&search;=
The Israelis “warned” the US an attack might happen.
Then there is an interview with Israeli spies arrested by the FBI on 9/11 for dancing and celebrating in New Jersey looking at the twin towers burn and collapse. They then fled in a white van towards a tunnel, with thousands of dollars stashed in a sock, boxcutters, and dressed as arabs.
Mysteriously they were released and fled to Israel, and soon after, Michael Chertoff, also of New Jersey, was appointed Homeland Security Director.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcON2XbFR3I
“our purpose was to document the event” What the HELL is that supposed to mean ??
No, David Duke is not “insane”. He should have cited these videos, etc, in his work for people like you who apparently believe Duke, who has a DOCTORATE would simply make up the fact that hundreds of Israeli spies were rounded up and deported after 9/11.
This is what Israelis think of young blonde swedish activists:
http://judicial-inc.biz/youngswedishpeaceactivist_sav.htm
This is what jews think of whites :
http://judicial-inc.biz/you_ng2.jpg
And I guess I have to remind you that they RAN OVER a young white American girl named Rachel Corrie with a goddamned bulldozer!
The problem is that Jared Taylor has apparently allowed a crack in the door for jewish infiltrators. I used to think he really believed that jews were great, etc. but seeing that article you recently posted, he’s trying to get a strategic alliance so he can appear on jewish television. Just like Nick Griffin. Today he was on Paula Zahn, who ran an hour long anti-white, anti racist screed today. I don’t know if she’s a jew, but she is married to a Cohen.
“And I just never understood how people can say Jews aren’t white - they’re often as white, blond, blue-eyed and fair as the whitest North European.”
Really? Do you have anthropological data to back that up? Or are you just going by your own, anecdotal, personal experience?
“They ARE of European geneology for the most part.”
Gee, putting “ARE” in capital letters really proves the point, doesn’t it? How about citing some genetic data to back that up?
Empiricism: why don’t the Jews associated with this attack on Jared Taylor avail themselves of commercially avaliable DNA testing technology as to demonstrate their “European geneology”, and then encourage their fellows to do the same?
Gee, how about answering this question:
when are you guys going to actually answer and refute Duke’s “obviously wrong and crazy” comments, instead of just linking to them with the assertion that the comments are “insane.”
Show us that the facts are wrong. Has Duke made up the story of the cheering Israelis arrested? Are his numbers with respect to casualties wrong?
Where’s the beef?
Although I understand your reservations towards anti-Semitism, I would like to point out that various anti-White initiatives were actively supported by Jews, who in this conflict of interests sided mostly with non-whites and minorities against the White majority.
A good example of this is the case of “soupe d’identite”, a traditional French recipe made from pork. Last winter, the soup was distributed by a group of French nationalists to the homeless people in several cities, together with a ham sandwich and a cup of red wine.
The charity was prohibited as “ethnically exclusive”, there were numerous protests from Muslim organizations AND Jewish organizations. What is especially puzzling in this case, is the fact, that French Jews feel threatened by the increase of Muslim immigration and complain that the French government does not protect them sufficiently from attacks of Muslim youths.
Yet, in case of French white nationalists, the Jews sided immediately against them with their alleged worst enemies.
So how can white nationalists/racialists belive that Jews will support them?
If Jews want to live in the future white states to be formed in Europe and parts of places like America, they should understand that Europeans will be the dominant alpha race in all these lands, Jews a charitable addition.
Part of that is to stop treating white leaders like Duke as European hate groups like the ADL and SPLC treat him, and to come to him with hat in hand.
That won’t happen, because for most Jews who support European nationalism, (not all, though), Europeans are simply the preferable body to attach a Jewish head to.
To the WUJS (World Union of Jewish Students): this website is by far your greatest accomplishment. Kudos.
Let us try and make these arguments more rational. Take Duke. In what way is he insane? Does he invent facts? If so, give examples. Does he outrageously misinterpret real facts? If so, give examples and explain why your interpretation is more reasonable. Does Duke over-inflate a real problem; in other words, is there a tendency of Jews to act against white interests, but Duke takes this to the point of obsessive self-destructivess? If so, explain.
Sailer complains that his leftist critics often critique him merely by quoting him and assuming that everyone who reads the quote will automatically see how “insane” it is. You are doing the same with Duke.
If Duke is really “nuts” then guys like Hart, Auster, The Realist should win a fair debate against him handily. Calling Duke a “f**king Nazi” is not winning a fair debate, by the way.
Then we have people here saying that Jews are Asians; on the other hand, others saying that Jews “ARE” geneologically European. In neither case are we presented with supportive evidence, other than the anecdotal “I saw a Jewish guy with blonde hair yesterday” type comments. That doesn’t cut it.
The biggest danger to race realism is neither guys like Duke nor guys like The Realist. The biggest problem is a lack of introspective thought, premise checking, rational argument, and accumulation of facts. Many think that because they are capable of making a statement, then that statement is true.
No one here is God; statements must stand or fall based on the validity of the facts supporting them and the logic of the arguments.
The founders of this site can start by challenging David Duke to an open and fair debate on these issues, and the rest of us can start by demanding the highest standards for the debate.
I would like the nightmare of tit for tat Jewish European violence to end. But it can only be done so by a divorce with all Jews living in a Jewish state.
Jews believe they have been persecuted by Europeans for the last 2,000 years in pomgroms etc, they believe Europeans defamed them with the blood libel,and they believe 6 millions Jews were murdered in the Holocaust.
It is no wonder that Jews hate Europeans and believe that Jews are morally superior to Europeans.
Being anti semitic is the non racist position ie that Jews behave exactly like all other human races and want revenge for past injustices. Philo semitism is the racist position that Jews are morally superior to other people and that the interests of Jews are exactly the same as other less privileged whites and Jews are all sweetness and light.
If Jews are Whites why is their a need for all the holocaust museums? and the need for all the Jewish lobbying organizations like the Board of Deputies and why is their a need for Jewish schools?
Humorous…. that anyone would deem it necessary to gain tribal approval to invoke a defense of the West…. one wonders if Queen Isabella sought their approval before the nation-saving expulsion of the muslims and their enablers - the jews…. all very humorous, indeed
Stoney (rhetorically) asks – “If Jews are Whites why is their a need for all the holocaust museums? and the need for all the Jewish lobbying organizations like the Board of Deputies and why is their a need for Jewish schools?”
Stoney,
Other than the designed separation implied within your questions, there are also valid (and non-threatening) reasons why such entities exist.
Why a Holocaust Museum? Perhaps, for the same reason a memorial was erected above the USS Arizona in Pearl Harbor. Peoples of all ethnic, racial, societal, and national stripes ought to be able to honor the memories of those events which are important to them. A better question might be why are there not more memorials dedicated to the historical plights and accomplishments of whites (besides the fact that virtually every street corner in every city would be needed to provide space for them all)? I fail to see how a museum threatens the interests of whites.
And, I would pose a similar response to the matter of lobbying organizations. Far greater a concern than the existence of a Jewish lobby organization ought to be the lack of a similar “white” lobbying organization. But, that’s not up to anyone other than us whites to produce.
Same can be said of schools. I’ve know Armenians who attended Armenian schools. Thanks to “My Big Fat Greek Wedding”, we’re all aware of Greek schools. I would imagine there are many others. And, again, just what threat do they pose to the interests of white people? Cultural preservation ought to be the “right” of any and all groups who wish to use their own money to pursue such ends.
Rather than lashing out in fear at the Jews, we ought to seek to emulate them in those endeavors which have proven successful to them.
Look, I don’t wish to act as an apologist for all Jews nor for all actions of Jews. But, I simply don’t see them all as enemies. Sure many do dislike other white Europeans, and most probably consider themselves to be superior. But, this is exactly the same as the majority of elites white liberals – a group to which those same Jews tend to belong. In the end, it is the liberal-leftist Marxist beliefs and aims of these people (White-Jewish-“fill in the blank”) which run counter to the benefit of all people of “non-color”.
Rather than engage in useless and self-destructive hatred of the Jews, I believe it far better to engage them as allies in what is, in reality, our shared struggle for society, for country, and for way-of-life. Hopefully I won’t annoy you further by stating I feel much the same way towards north-east Asians, assimilated Hispanics, and (No!!!….say it ain’t so!) reasonable and intelligent blacks.
As a more general comment, true, a red “X” would be more fitting over the image of Sontag than of Duke, but the real battle is too great and the real stakes too high to waste time in dead-end unproductive ends such as anti-Semitism.
You said, “Furthermore, any article that I published would have to concede that much of the commentary about Jews in the white nationalist community, including the whole of Holocaust denial, is sick and evil.”
Holocaust “denial”, sir? Questioning the veracity of six million gassed to death is “sick and evil?” Why? Do you, or does anyone, know where are the bodies? No - because there aren’t any bodies.
You could, if you were so inclined, do a little research about the subject BEFORE dismissing it out-of-hand. A good, nay excellent, place to begin is with declassified Soviet documents (and Soviet-supressed Nazi records) from the era and places (i.e. Auschwitz) in question.
Here are two good links to start you on your way to REAL reality, Mr. Realist.
http://judicial-inc.biz/Auschwitz.htm
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/ccmoney.html
You can take it from there, if you wish.
Set up a forum too, your idea has tremendous potential.
As long as we don’t distance from the obsessions of a jewish conspiracy we will never be able to walk freely.
We will be just in the realm of the nuts and cretins.
While the real problem lies in the communistic and freemasonic ideals that have destroyed any belief in identitity and patriotism.
I’m an identitarian, I believe in identitarian antions: where I think that any people has teh right to have its own nation where it may practie its mores freely without having to squabble or fight with others.
And an identitarian state is well deserved for all the Hebrew in the world too, they are a people like any other.
We need not to become the servants of middle east moslem tyrants like the present iranian president to be free of the invaders that are flocking in our european or american lands, while we need to fight our real enemies, the white liberals that are opening the doors and inviting them in.
Thank you for this website, I will be glad to help if I could
In response to Skeptic:
You are right that I am going off my personal experience when I say that Jews look white to me, and often have the same physical attributes, such as skin tone, hair and eye color, etc., that we associate with Europeans. I admit that my position comes down to: in my general experience, many Jews I have met look white to me. But what’s wrong with that mode of evidence? Of course I haven’t met every Jew in the world to confirm that the majority are white. Must I? Isn’t it enough for me to say: the vast majority of Jews I have met looked white to me, and I can induce from my experience that most are white. Besides, what do we even mean by “being white” if not physical characteristics? Would you consider a white Gentile who converted to Judaism to longer be “white”? How can a set of attitudes in a person’s head change a person’s race?
I don’t ask these questions to be facetious. I mean them as honest questions. I confess ignorance here, I confess that I’m going upon my personal experience. I’d be happy to read up on any credible literature on the claim that Jews aren’t white, however “white” is defined.
One final remark. I do think that the burden of proof is on those who claim that Jews aren’t white to back that claim up. If a group of people look white, and have European ancestry going back hundreds of years, then the presumption must be that, absent contrary evidence, they are white. Otherwise, we could have absurd claims like, “All Czechs aren’t white.” It would be a fair response to say, “They sure look white to me, it’s up to you to show me that Czechs aren’t white.” I’m trying to have an open mind here and I’m willing to consider whatever evidence you and others can direct me to. But I am going to presume that Jews are white until I am directed to evidence that shows otherwise.
“I do think that the burden of proof is on those who claim that Jews aren’t white to back that claim up.”
Every time you hear, “anti-Semite!” (racist!) hurled at a White person, you have instant confirmation that Jews are not White. When Jews stop trying to be White and non-White at the same time, having it both ways, and claiming racism by Whites, then perhaps Whites will stop bringing this issue up.
Breha—I’m glad you like the site. If you (or anyone else) want to volunteer, please write to me via the contact page.
http://inverted-world.com/index.php/site/contact/
Mark Potak – “No - because there aren’t any bodies.”
Mark,
I just have to ask, in a world where blacks are demanding over-representation in all financial rewards while increasing their violence upon us, where millions of mestizo’s are invading with taxpayers picking up their growing tabs, and where something like one billion Muslims would like to kill us all off; just what the Hell does it matter if the Nazi’s killed 6 million or 6 Jews over 60 years ago?
Oh Wait! My mistake! If the Holocaust can be proven a hoax, all other problems will simply go away. How could I have missed that one?
Pull the plug on the forum idea. Moderate these comments with an iron fist. The entire project is already sinking in the fierce winds of exhaled anti-Semitic gasses. If you don’t take a firm hand the signal-to-noise ratio will be very low.
I think there is some confusion between Zionism as a political movement and Jewish people in general. I consider myself to be an anti-Zionist but I am not anti-Jewish people. Furthermore, the term “anti-Semitic” is a misnomer because the majority of Jewish people are Ashkenazi Jews and have no genetic ties to the Middle East.
First, to The Realist:
Thank you for starting this site. It’s always good to see another voice for white people. I hope other sites start linking to this one.
Second, to no one in particular, I think that Jews have unquestionably been overrepresented in anti-white movements, and their participation in such movements is motivated largely by ethnocentrism, not just by a liberal belief system. MacDonald (among others) makes a pretty overwhelming case for this, IMO. With that said, white countries would still have enormous problems if every Jew in them left for Israel tomorrow. There are a tremendous number of white Gentile race-traitors, and while Jews may have been a necessary cause in creating the conditions where such Gentiles are tolerated, the fact is that such Gentiles do not need Jews to maintain their influence. So, I hope people will not focus too much on the Jewish aspect of our current problem. There are millions of people like Mike Nifong out there too.
Third, to “OK,” I enjoyed the link to FoxNews very much, although I am not sure how damning it is. Many of the Israeli spies who were reounded up probably were just doing normal Israeli spying (which I know they do a lot of), rather than 9/11-related stuff. I doubt Israel had specific knowledge about 9/11. I imagine they knew what the U.S. knew in early September- that an attack of some magnitude was imminent. But I am open to any evidence here- any information about the cash and the boxcutters that the five Israeli’s would be much appreciated.
Once again, a big thank-you to The Realist and any one helping with this site.
“Jews are not pro-white because Jews are not white. They are an international trans-racial/trans-country tribe/organization/ethny with IQs that range from retarded (the Falash-Mura) to higher than white folks (the Ashkenazim) and skin colors that go from deepest black to brown to yellow to white.”
Bill, did you know that Ashkenazi Jews, who are white, make up 80% of all Jews world-wide? The “deepest” black, brown and yellow Jews that you’re talking about aren’t as prevalent as you seem to think. You also have to take into account Sephardi (Iberian) Jews; they’re white, and their numbers are equal to 1,700,000.
Here are links to my sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sephardi_Jews
Dear Awakened:
Hey Big Bill, nice to see a post from you. Always enjoyed your writings at AmRen. You always come across intelligent and thoughtful.
If you are a gentile married to a Jew, you are “finishing the job Hitler started” to quote a common Jewish proverb.
Well, that’s why I did it. I hate Jews so much that I was willing to marry one just to mix my hillbilly blood with one of their kind just so the genocide could continue. When I need to make a decision in romance the first thing I think is, “What would Hitler do?” This is also the way I pick cell phone plans.
You are “loving the Jews to death” as other Torah-true Jews put it, by miscegenating with them and watering down their nation and tribe.
My wife is half Japanese and half Jewish American Princess. She’s what we call a JapJAP. So I guess she’s already impure and a blight against the full blooded seed of Abraham. Don’t worry, she and all her dirty kind will be rightfully destroyed by the Messiah when he returns to set things “right”. Which I guess any Jew that wasn’t 100% middle eastern would be destined for the same end, as well as everyone else not of pure Abrahamic seed, according to certain interpretations of certain scriptures. Since most scriptures are innately vague it’s hard to say what some of them are getting at. Very few are as clear as “Though shalt not steal!” or the one that says you have to stone to death anyone caught working on the Sabbath (Funny, as clear as that last one is, I don’t think even the hard core Torah loving Jews do what they’re told).
The opinion of a fundamentalist from any faith is just that. They do not reflect the views of the overwhelming majority of others of that faith. More importantly, fundamentalists don’t reflect the true intent or nature of scripture. Fundis have views that are at the extreme literal end of an idea, which is to say their views lack balance. They suffer from a dissociative psychosis that has caused them to lose touch with reality and their views should be taken with a giant grain of salt.
As true Jews (not the “neo-Christian” Reform and Reconstructionist Jews) pointed out when Vice-Presidential Candidate Joe Lieberman said he was not against miscegenation of Jews and non-Jews, the Jewish law is against miscegenation, and by pretending otherwise Joe is either lying to white America or lying to himself.
Or maybe he can think for himself. They don’t stone people for working on the Sabbath anymore, nor do they send women outside of the city when they get their monthly visit from Aunt Floe.
People believe what makes them happy and rationalize scriptures around these views to back them up. People pick and choose what they believe.
If you want to have your decisions made by Iron Age religious philosophers have at it. Just realize that even the Bible says scripture, like prophecy, fails from time to time.
True Jews will continue to fight as they have for over 200 years to have the Christian heritage, religion, and culture removed from the village square or otherwise marginalized to the fringes of American life so they will not suffer defections of their children or miscegenation with gentiles.
“True Jews”? What authority has given them this title over other Jews? I know a large number of Jews. Very few have married or are dating other Jews. All but in one case did the parents seem to have a problem with their kid marrying who their heart told them to be with.
MOST atheist I know are all for getting rid of any religious symbol in public. They would turn “Christmas” into “generic holiday #3: winter edition” at the blink of an eye. They claim to do this based on the separation of church and state, but they’re mainly just trying to get others to conform to their beliefs. This is human nature.
The Daily Show made fun of people claiming that there was a war on Christmas. They tried to show that Christians were just being paranoid. Of course everyone in front of the camera making these jokes was Jewish. The obvious insensitivity to other’s beliefs they were showing was beyond them. The fact that the overwhelming majority of their staff is Jewish doesn’t stop them from pointing out when others discriminate for their own kind – ie only white, male, and gentile. We’re all familiar with THE double standard. They would never suggest that Israel take down all their candle holders on public display during this time of year.
I have confronted many of my Jewish friends and their family for certain attitudes and beliefs in regards to double standards. I’ll catch them stereotyping Southern Whites as all being anti-Semitic or racist. I then point out that they’re the ones being a bigot. I also point out that they’re attacking my family and myself (Most Valley Jews when first meeting me think I’m also a Valley Jew so they tend to be open about what they say).
I believe this approach of calling an individual out for practicing these double standards can be done on a larger scale once we straight, white, male gentiles have an advocacy group that represents and promotes our group while refraining from attacking another group as a whole. As we have learned in the past from the various “civil rights” groups, a small group can overcome any single individual and thus, like dominoes, a group can be divided and prevented from oppressing another group.
True Jews will continue to measure America by the extent to which it (1) welcomes Jews from anywhere in any numbers and (2) continues to fight for Israel’s continued existence as a gentile-excluding country.
Hey, they’re only following the Protocols.
As far as Jews being white, what about the Ethiopian Jews, the Arabic Sephardic Jews, the Jews from India, or tribal Jews from the mountains of South America?
The word “Jew” can refer to many different things and types of grouping. It can mean someone who practices the Jewish faith or even certain races that have become synonymous with the word. I believe we are, for the most part, referring to the ones called “Ashkenazim” (anyone else find it funny that the word has “nazi” in it?). Though there is a big debate going on in regards to the findings of various genetic tests, it is apparent to anyone with eyes that they are a mixture of European and Middle Easterner. The amount of how much of which varies from individual to individual.
For that reason, true Jews cannot support white nationalism. If they did, they would have to betray and deny their own kind, and that is a fundamental bedrock principle
I’m not a white nationalist. I’m just some guy that is against Affirmative Action, busing, and the demonization of Europeans. More importantly I believe that one should be free to associate with whomever they want in the private sector and their private lives.
I also believe that white gentile straight males need a respectable advocacy group. I am COMPLETELY sure that if this civil rights group is to come to pass, the group will have to eschew “White Nationalism” for “White Civil Rights” and promote our accomplishments (as opposed to other groups shortcomings) by fighting against individuals who defame us. Focus on the culture and the people that created concepts like The Bill of Rights and honor this achievement and fight to see that it is respected and preserved. The group would also bring lawsuits against any company or individual, funded by tax dollars, practicing discrimination against our kind.
that Torah-true Jews—the only real Jews—are commanded never to do.
Once again, how are they the only “TRUE” Jews? Fundamentalist are an extreme minority in the Jewish group. Just like ours. Taking something meant to be symbolic for literal makes you a “True Jew”? Seems to me it just makes you an individual given to fantasy.
All Jews are real. Try poking some if you don’t believe me.
And finally, no criticism of Jewish behavior is permitted unless you agree that it is 100% a “legacy of anti-semitism”. At its root, all evil comes from white people, as Susan Sontag noted. I can assure you she did not consider herself, her family, her clan or her tribe to be a part of the “cancerous” white race she damned.
Well, double standards were made to be broken. People like this should be focused on individually and brought to public light. This is standard operating procedure for Civil Rights groups and has been effective for many decades.
That being said, one of my favorite race-realists is Rabbi Kahane. He was an honest and honorable fighter for his people against all others.
Well, there you go. A Jew you can get behind. He’s not Neo you know. There are others like him.
Look BB, pure and simple, people suck. Unfortunately for any group, we are normally known for members of our group that suck at an exceptional level, suck masters if you will. We all are the Purpose of our Maker. We all must learn to get along and remember that our enemy isn’t each other. Our Enemy is invisible and hides in the hearts of all men. We need to fight against EVIL ideas if we are to move forward.
An innocent man is not guilty of his brother’s sins.
My response to Realist’s post at Stormfront is here:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/theinvertedworld/
Already the communist jews are urging to “Moderate these comments with an iron fist.”
Can’t stand the truth, huh?
Here’s some analysis :
Jared recently appeared on CNN’s Paula Zahn show, an hour long anti-white screed. She’s married to a Cohen, I’m not sure if she’s a jew.
She has on a guest, to argue with Jared, Paula Rothenberg, author of some “white skin privilege” book.
This is an organized conspiracy, it’s all out in the open, just look at their last names, damnit.
If they were Italians, we would point it out.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/12/skindeep_racism.php
As has been said by someone else here, you can’t argue with our facts. Which is why there has been no attempt to argue our facts, and there can’t be any effort, because we are telling the truth.
The only thing you are left to do iscall us names, like “you fucking nazi” and storm out of the room.
Because, the truth hurts.
Jared should have shut Paula Rothenberg up immediately, calling her a genocidal jew, but he’s playing with his hands tied behind his back, probably so that he can appear on these jewish shows and get beaten up.
Dear Ms. Realist and Fellow Readers,
Ms. Realist has started an intriguing Website. She dares to question in no uncertain terms the liberal orthodoxy about the role of white people in this world. Some of those white people are Jewish people, and the emphasis is on people. When Jewish people are described in racial discussions as them or the Jews, it tends to reject Jewish people as human beings—not that pronouns or naming are taboo when discussing Jewish people. It would be helpful to insert the word people at least once when referring to Jewish people during a posting.
One might argue some Jews are always involved in activity detrimental to non-Jews. But this holds true for non-Jews—indeed, Jewish people can accomplish nothing substantially detrimental to a world full of non-Jews without the support of huge numbers of non-Jews. So whom do we blame?
Paul
Alec, I wish your comment would have made it higher up on the comments list! As I got about half-way through the comments I noticed the paganists appeared.
I am an Ashkenazi Jew and I can assure them that I am thoroughly White. I have green eyes (the rarest in the world, most often found in northernmost Germany), blond hair, 6’ 4” in height, etc.
I hope their comments didn’t scare other Whites off.
I’m anything but a suck up. I’m not a sockpuppet and I’m not someone who is afraid to disagree with some jews. But I believe jews have the right to be pro-white, and it is a good thing when jews become pro-white. Good luck.
A number of people have complained about the comments being posted on IW, including Larry Auster at his blog. They say that I should just delete anti-Semitic comments because they make intelligent discussion impossible.
This is a valid point that I have a great deal of sympathy with. However, no matter how much I disagree with them, I think it has to be admitted that the posters of the comments in question also have a valid point. They are on solid ground when they say it is unfair of me to delete their comments for being unintelligent and ugly when I haven’t defined what those terms mean. In the absence of clarification, they have a right to surmise that I’m just deleting comments because I don’t like them or because they scare me or because I’m taking orders from the House of Rothschild.
So, here’s what I’m going to do. Next week, I’m going to write a column fleshing out why I consider certain varieties of commentary on the racial right insane and unworthy of inclusion on this website. I will do my best to lay out acceptable boundaries of discussion. I will then let everyone have their say, and after that, I will moderate comments according to the policy I have set out.
I don’t think drawing boundaries between valid and invalid commentary on racial matters is irrelevant navel-gazing, as one of my friends said it was. I think it’s a crucial part of my project of establishing a sane and mature race realist movement.
Between now and the publication of the next column, I will delete anti-Semitic comments because I think you all have had your say for now.
For further discussion of this topic, see this entry on View from the Right:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006916.html
I just have to copy this classic paragraph here:
“In fact, the fondest desire of the anti-Semites, short of their desire to see Jews disappear from the earth, is their desire to get themselves included in relatively mainstream discussion so they will have a chance to get someone other than themselves to listen to their obsessive explanation of the universe. The anti-Semites’ constant undying complaint is that they are being unfairly excluded, because other people can’t handle their great and irrefutable arguments. In fact they are excluded because they are actually are what they accuse Jews of being—a poisonous form of sub-humanity, from which normal humans are instinctively repelled. That is why the anti-Semites’ greatest desire is to be accepted, because acceptance would appear to wipe out the actual reality of what they are.”
It’s your world that’s “turned upside down” the problem isn’t White Nationalist anti-Semitism; it’s the relentless separatism and anti-Gentilism of the Jewish minority. Elite minorities like the Huguenots and the Fleming’s came to the UK and assimilated. There is no Board of Deputies of British Flemings or British Huguenots, why do we need a Board of Deputies of British Jews? It is sometimes hard not to suspect that Jewish separatism is tinged by a sense of superiority to, and contempt for Gentile culture. There are plenty of demands for the British to have an official Holocaust remembrance day; when will Tel Aviv inaugurate a day of gratitude for my ancestors who fought and defeated the Nazi regime that oppressed Jews? We all know the answer to that is never.
“If you are a gentile married to a Jew, you are “finishing the job Hitler started” to quote a common Jewish proverb.”
By Big Bill on 12/13/06 at 1:58 am
I am always astounded at the level of idiocy, ignorance, and insanity perpetuated by Jew- haters and Jew-baiters. It simply defies rationality.
Never in all my born days have I or any Jew I’ve ever known, spoken to, or read ever uttered such a ridiculous thing as you say is a “Jewish proverb.” I defy you — I utterly defy — you to cite where that supposed “Jewish proverb” came from.
“The closest genetic cousins of Jews are Arabs, not Nordics, Alpines, or Mediteranean stock.” Absolutely false. Arabs ARE mediteranean however, Islam has encouraged them to mix with non-caucasian populations.
Sephardic jews are part of the mediteranean people, and ashekenazi jews are mixed with the alpinic people, some mixed to the point where they are more alpinic than mediteranean.
There’s no other way to say it. YOU’RE LYING.
Calvin, I have to agree with what you said. I know many Jewish people do come off that way. I think much of it is done because Jews are so few in number. I also think they will reach out to other minorities (this is often insane I admit) when they feel threatend by the majority.
You make an excellent argument for discussion. I do hope the Realist will allow comments like yours.
In addition, I do hope the Realist will permit those of us who happen to be religious comment here as well. I am a scientist and a religious person. I look forward to debating the evolutionists among us with great relish.
Moshe
There are a lot of comments on here deriding Jews because they are supposedly against “white values”. A number of commenters have pointed out that many of the media and sources of mainstream information are operated and controlled by Jews, and that this somehow makes them less white. A few thoughts in response:
Assuming, for the sake of argument, that it is true that the majority of Jews are liberals who buy into the modern day liberal orthodoxy concerning race and racial oppression, how does that make them less white? There are many, many non-Jewish white people who hold and espouse similar beliefs. Just visit any elite university, and you’ll find many white professors of all faiths and creeds (including, of course, those of no religious faith), who vehemently espouse the accepted orthodoxy that, to put it simplistically, “white is bad”. Are none of them white? Consider another group: homosexuals. Almost all homosexuals are very liberal on social issues, including race. Are none of them “white” because of their beliefs? Are we saying that being liberal and being white are mutually exclusive? If so, that just redefines the meaning of race into a meaningless semantic mess: under this view, “whiteness” is just a set of beliefs in the head regardless of a person’s physical and genetic characteristics. That view is absurd, if only because it would mean that someone could become, or lose, their status of being white by changing his beliefs. (Query: does the Gentile who marries and converts to Judaism suddently change his racial status? Response: no, he changes his religious convictions, but he can’t “lose” his whiteness). Whatever may be the beliefs and attitudes of many Jews (an empirical question about which none of the commenters above have offered any credible evidence), that has no bearing upon their genetics and ancestry and thus membership in the white race.
I find the remarks of Mark Potok to be bizarre, but not surprising at all!
I have long held that the American Left is as off the map regarding the genocides of both Nazism and Communism, as is the “far-Right.” The multicultural far-Left isn’t really concerned with the genocides of the past other than covering them up, because they currently plot and work for an “ethnic cleansing” via miscegenation across the West. This is primarily directed at whites, but since miscegenation requires a white-nonwhite union, they don’t seem to mind that other groups get a genetic “realignment” in the process?
In the end, Mr. Potok’s irrational propositions are as eloquent an example of why a publication such as The Inverted World is desperately needed, than anything I could have written simply applauding its inception.
Good luck and God Bless Realist!
Moshe—Why would I have any problem with religious people commenting? What kind of lunatic would bar the large majority of mankind from commenting on his site?
And you can talk about God if you want to. After all, this isn’t a public school! Break a leg!
As far as debating evolutionists, you’d better wait until I publish something about evolution before doing so, or else your comments won’t be relevant, will they?
Dealing with the evolution/creationism debate would be opening a major can of worms. Do you think this debate is relevant to the topics addressed by this website? How?
“…when will Tel Aviv inaugurate a day of gratitude for my ancestors who fought and defeated the Nazi regime that oppressed Jews? We all know the answer to that is never.”
By calvin on 12/14/06 at 5:11 pm
Wrong. It’s a done deal.
There has been for many a year a permanent memorial to righteous gentiles who helped Jews in WWII.
Get your facts straight.
I, like so many others, have cut my teeth about Racial Awareness with Amren, but have often been troubled with the “Jews are demons” crowd. I find this too similar to Germany’s SA-type propaganda and it makes me uncomfortable. However much I am for some sort of major reform shift in this country, I do not believe that any party based on pure hatred alone can create any lasting good. Evil in and of itself will only breed evil. This does not mean that we have to “accept” everyone that is not our color or origin without an eye of scepticism. The way to political reform which can save us from the dustbin of history has to come from an awakening of Love and Admiration by Whites for White culture, technology, and the heritage it has created over hundreds of years. We have to reverse years of destructive PC, white-guilt, and educational leftist indoctrination forced upon us and now our children. Only then, when looking through that untainted prism, will we be able to openly and truthfully deal correctly with the problems assaulting our country and destroying our American lifestyles. Thank you for this site, may it help bring together the next generation of those that have removed the blinders from their eyes and shackles from their minds. I actually found this site with a reference from Amren and still plan on a daily visit to both sites.
Let’s see, you quote the SPLC, you prefer that people who espouse contrarian views be “prohibited” or “excluded” from voicing their opinion, you refer to Israel as a “free, first-world society”, and you urge Taylor to “condemn” his audience.
Taylor hit the nail on the head when he refered to your letter as condescending.
He was being generous.
This is in response to one of Moshe’s comments, namely that he has “green eyes” which are “among the rarest in the world.” I’m not disputing this, but it prompted me to ponder a few things.
1) What is the range or spectrum of eye color among humans? Say dark brown or black on one end, and green on the other? What other varieties are there in between, besides blue? How rare are gray eyes, which some people claim to have? (And are gray eyes just a variant or lighter and shade of blue eyes?) Are white genes the only genes which allow for lighter eye colors among humans?
2) Are there any famous people with green eyes with pictures you can point to? I would be curious to see some on the internet for comparisons sake. I recently dated a woman who claimed she had green eyes, but since we were meeting in a dark restaurant, I wasn’t able to examine her claim too closely. But I’m looking forward to on future dates. 
3) Finally, it seems that for the most part, only the white race offers these splendid examples of human beauty (as I think “White, Jewish, and Proud” pointed out in a different forum). All other races that offer up models of their own for beauty contests, etc. seem to be largely an approximation of white beauty. (Compare, say, what the models for Miss Universe who are sent from Latin America look like compared to the predominant looks of that region).
It seems sad that this will be yet another item, great physical beauty, which will perish from this earth when whites are reduced to a small portion of it. I wonder if there is any way, given our advances in technology and genetics, that we may be able to come up with a way to preserve and indeed have these genes flourish on earth in way which would be in keeping with our humanity and indeed be acceptable to the West’s traditional Judeo-Christian morality.
Finally, a race realist site that eschews anti-semitism! This is just what I’ve been waiting for. I wish you good luck with this site and shall follow its development with great interest.
Thanks very much for this site. I don’t know if you are Jewish or not, but I am, and I am white as any non-Jew. I don’t hate blacks or Spanish personally, but our current race relations are wrong. We Jews are on the side of Christianity and the West, not against it, and we know how cruel Eastern Muslim Arabs can be. The Jewish media, hollywood, ADL, Democrats, etc. don’t know what is in their best interests, and they tend to be almost as anti-Israel as Duke. The pro-Euro-American pro-Western movement will only succeed when it roots out its hate, Nazism and anti-Semitism.
This is the anthropological data that Skeptic demanded “On the whole, it can be stated that most of the blond Jews are found in countries where the general population has a considerable proportion of blonds. This is exemplified by the number of blond Jews in England, twenty-five per cent., and in Germany, where over thirty per cent. of Jewish children had blond hair. On the other hand, in Italy, where the Christian population is distinctly brunette, less than five per cent. of the Jews are blond, while in Algeria, Bokhara, the Caucasus, etc., the percentage is even less.” –Maurice Fishberg For more about blond Jews, you can consult books by the American Anthropologist Maurice Fishberg. I think this will convince you.
Do you what the above facts show? It shows Hitler was MURDERER OF BLONDS, blonds who liked Moshe Stein or like Bar Rafaeli, Caprice, and Esti Ginsberg or like Havi Mond. Out of the 6 million Jews murdered by Hitler at least 1 MILLION OF THEM WERE BLONDS.I don’t how can someone call Hitler as a white nationalist? By white nationalist do you mean a MURDERER OF BLONDS? Moreover, more than 50 million WHITE EUROPEANS WERE KILLED DURING WW 2, ALL DUE TO A DEVIL NAMED HITLER. Hitler was nothing but a MURDERER OF BLONDS, A KILLER OF WHITES AND AN ENEMY OF WHITE RACE? Does anyone disagree with me?
A TRUE WHITE NATIONALIST can never be anti-Judaic or anti-catholic like David Duke? Because anti-Judaism is ANTI-WHITE? I believe The Realist will agree with me. THIS FOR BOB.BOTH THE ISRAELI MODEL ESTI GINZBORG AND SARAH MICHELLE GELLAR HAS GREEN EYES(COINCIDENTALLY BOTH JEWISH)
As a staunch member of the JTF.ORG Forum I am glad to see their is another place on the web that shares our ideas and goals for America and Israel. I have given your site a quick once over and it looks like my kind of place. Your site is the topic of conversation tonight on JTF am also going to recommend some of the other members of JTF.org forum drop in and see for themselves what you have here.
Probably due to their unusual intelligence, the Ashkenazi have been quite overrepresented in all complex affairs of civilization, from sciences and arts to finance and politics.
While involvement in the sciences has yielded much global good, involvement in politics has yielded leftist nastiness of varying degree, from the bloodbaths of Bolshevism to the Hollywood cancer of today. This, the disproportionate concentration of wealth, and the self-segregation tendencies, renders anti-Semitism at the very least understandable and perhaps not unreasonable.
But I don’t find the Jews to be a cohesive entity, and so don’t feel that anti-Semitic views are deserved across the board. More broadly, I don’t see even a small number of people, such as the US government, capable of acting secretly and cohesively, much less an entire people. I think conspiracy of any kind on a large scale is outright impossible due to basic human self-interest and incompetence. Someone invariably leaks, sells out, or screws up.
And here’s a personal data point to round out the post. My extended family is half Ashkenazi. We have quite a few PhDs among us but no lawyers of financiers; we think that the relationship between the US and Israel is ridiculous, particularly post USS Libery and such incidents; we take a very dim view of Hollywood and the pervasive Jewish leftism; we believe that the Jewish tendency to be in bed with the Blacks is a self-destructive insanity.
And hey, we’re not alone in this view.
Hello
I don’t subscribe to an ideology that sees the Jews as ‘evil’, however they do seem to have a group interest that is opposed to the interests of whites in many important ways, chief among these and central to our future, is the issue of immigration.
__ “To be sure, a new front in the culture war has recently opened on which most neoconservatives do seem to differ from other conservatives, and that is the issue of immigration.”__ (Neoconservatism - A Eulogy by Norman Podhoretz)
Their disproportionate power and influence to their numbers, has to be addressed as crucial to any discussion of racial realism, and especially with regards to how this relates to the issue of immigration.
With all do respect and consideration to individual Jews, organized Jewish opposition to stopping non-white immigration, is the elephant in the room to any organized white activism that refuses to go away.
It has to be dealt with. Do you propose to deal with it by not discussing it?
Just as antisemites try to prove that social bolshevism is a Jewish conspiracy by citing the names of such Jewish intellectuals as Marx, Boas, Gramsci, and Stephen J Gould, one could just as easily argue that academic racism is a Jewish conspiracy by citing the names of such men as Hans Eysenck, Richard J. Herrnstein, Michael Levin, and Arthur Jensen, who have all been denounced as racists by egalitarian ideologues, and who are all, as is well known, Jews.
Even if Jewish involvement in social bolshevism is disproportionate in respect of their numbers, it is for the same reason that Jews are overrepresented in academia in general - they have higher IQs.
Moshe Stein, your philosophy is quite ignorant. What if Vanessa Williams were to stand up and claim that she were white due to her green eyes. Yes, you may have green eyes ( a hybrid of brown and blue), but a true aryan would have BLUE eyes.
You sound desperate. Desperate to belong, and sad to be an outcast. Perhaps you were orthodox growing up. I am well aware of orthodox families where one offspring may appear light, whilst the next is dark as the night, kinky hair, big, non-aryan nose.
I am stunned by this site, however, insecurity often breeds contempt for others, and a desperate attempt to want to fit in. No, jews are not white. Yes, the European Jews are MIXED with white, which is why SOME MAY have a white PHENOTYPE, but not a white genotype. THis is much like light skinned blacks, where some may appear to have a lighter phenotype than others.
TRUE WHITE NATIONALIST, your pathetic expressions are just that.If you look at the racial categories, you would know that a jew is not white. A jew is MIXED with white. So, this, by definition, is not white. Just like the phenomenon of BLACKS PASSING FOR WHITE IN THE SOUTH, JEWS ARE PASSING FOR WHITE, DUE TO SOME WHITE BLOOD RESULTING IN THE PHENOTYPE.
So some jews intermarried with aryans, but this does not make them white. Many blacks mixed with white have a white phenotype, but this does not make them white. So, stop trying to be that which you are not. (LOOK AT THE BLACK MUSICAL GENIUS QUINCY JONES, AND HIS DAUGHTER RASHID WHO HAS A WHITE PHENOTYPE….MIXING WITH WHITE PRODUCES LIGHTER…)
I had a best friend who grew up in a Jewish neighborhood, and you can most certainly distinguish their phenotype from that which prevailed amongst we WASP’S, the dominant group where I attended boarding school. This is so sad to see some of you obsessed with being blond. Were this such a natural occurrence, one would not see the prevalence of well known cosmetic procedures to make your appearance resemble that of your known enemy, the NAZI.
Sad, so sad. Yes, the culture promotes studying, yet that does not make you genetically superior. just STUDIOUS, who have been forced to learn to survive. A little bit of white goes a long way in the way of phenotype…but you are NOT white. Genetic tests substantiate the presence of known mitochondrial markers, revealing that you are BROTHERS TO THE PALESTINIANS, AND YOU KNOW IT IN YOUR HISTORY BOOKS, THE BIBLE.
STOP THE LIES, THE SELF-LIES. JEWS ARE NOT WHITE.
I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate you starting this site. It is much needed.
I like AmRen a lot too, but like you, have never understood irrational hatred towards Jews. They are a high achieving, high IQ, law abiding group of fellow whites in my estimation.
I wonder if we will ever again have the spine to take back our once proud country.
The only way I see it happening, unfortunately, since the pols have thrown us under the bus for 45 years, is that as our numbers decrease as a percentage of the population, and we pay the lion’s share of liberals social experiments, and as we are physically preyed upon, FINALLY, after enough of that has happened, the hope would be that our kind would band together and retake this once great land.
Seems like a grim prospect, but it is either that, or be erased from history.
Thanks for the site.
A site that is Pro-white,intellectual,and Jewish? Sounds great! I support this site 100% regardless of what others may say.
I became “anti-semitic” or perhaps realized how Jews negatively impacted my employment prospects because I am white when I got a good look at the names of the lawyers involved in the anti-white side of all the affirmative action lawsuits.
They were mostly Jewish names. I counted only the most obvious Jewish names like Goldberg as Jewish. I did not count maybe Jewish names like Becker and Bergman as Jewish.
Kaiser vs Weber, Duke Power vs Griggs, all the unqualified blacks vs police and government agencies, in every affirmative action case you will find that the pro affirmative action, anti white attorneys were mostly Jews.
For instance Prop 209, the California anti affirmative action initiative that passed with a huge majority. It went through the appeals process.
Attorneys opposed to prop 209 filed a lawsuit against it as soon as the state court building opened the day after the election. Obviously the suit had been prepared well in advance of election day.
Numberous racist anti white organizations such as NOW, ACLU, ADL, SPLC, etc etc filed friend of the court briefs against prop 209.
Every filing involved in the lengthy appeals process had a list of all the attorneys and addresses involved so that the court clerks could send out copies of all court papers to the several hundred attorneys involved.
I counted all the attorney’s names. 80 percent of those names were obviously Jewish names.
As a non Jewish white, I cannot help but notice that the attorneys who created and now uphold affirmative action were and are mostly Jews. Affirmative action means that an employer must hire an illegal alien felon with no qualifications over the must superbly qualified American white.
There is also the fact that the Simon Weisenthal Center and Museum of Tolerance and Hatred of Whites has inserted itself into the notorious Long Beach Ca. 2006 Halloween beating of 3 white women. The thugs who were convicted were not sent to Juvenile camp as the Probation Department recommened.
The thugs were sent to summer school at the Weisenthal Center. Furthermore Los Angeles County is paying the center $29,000 to teach 3 black thugs their version of tolerance. I live near the Weisenthal Center and have attended some of their programs. The gist of their tolerance classes is the Tim Wise mantra, whites must be exterminated.
Incidentally, one of the 3 women the black thugs beat is permanently blind in one eye and faces years of reconstructive surgery because one of the thugs saved from Juvenile camp beat her face to a pulp with his skateboard.
So what is an objective person to think about this? Black thugs beat 3 white women, one of whom is blinded and disabled. The Jewish Weisenthal Center spends months bullying the Probation Department to exonerate the thugs (the Probation Department which is mostly affirmative action blacks strongly recommened Juvenile Camp as a punishment.)
The Weisenthal Center manages to get the case moved from its proper jurisdiction to black Judge Irma Brown in Inglewood. The Weisenthal Center got them off. A week before the hearing in front of Irma Brown one of the thugs attacked and robbed a white woman. And now the Weisenthal Center is teaching the 3 thugs their version of Tolerance, which is Whiteness must be exterminated.
So what is a non Jewish white to think of all this? Jews created and enforce affirmative action. Jews have sided with black criminals and against their white victims since the 1940’s.
The Weisenthal Center is teaching 3 black thugs who blinded a white woman that whites must be exterminated and that blacks are justified in murdering, beating and robbing whites because to quote Tim Wise “whites must be exterminated.”
Realist said: “ I started this website because I came to believe that none of the existing publications that promote white racial interests would ever do so effectively. I have many reasons for believing this, but the primary one is that all of them are too accommodating to the radical anti-Semitism that pervades the American racial right.”
Although I can understand the concerns of Carolyn Brady, however, if we are going to succeed, our main objective MUST be to ‘mainstream’ the White preservation movement. Bashing Jews is a sure-fire way of derailing that objective. Jew bashing not only antagonizes Jews, but it also repulses (or turns off) most everyone else.
That said, I think more and more people in the WP movement realize this.
Realist, I know your ideas are be spreading and taking affect. More and more, I see others moving towards a more moderate/reasonable stance when advancing WP. The fringe radial Jew haters are being marginalized even within WN websites.
Example from Majority Rights:
>>when ‘the Great Day’ comes, most, if not all, kikes will have to be bull-dozed into a big pit & then incinerated!…..jews are a filthy corrupting, pustulating virus on the body politic of the White Race!
RAHOWA!
Posted by jimbo on Friday, August 10, 2007 at 12:48 PM | #
————————————————————————————————————————
Jimbo I like and respect you, and of course we’re on the same side, but … hadn’t you better … rethink one or two of your rhetorical tactics? Hey just a friendly thought, comrade. We do want to advance our point of view in the shortest possible time, no?
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Friday, August 10, 2007 at 01:03 PM | #
————————————————————————————————————————
Jimbo, improve yourself. There will be no Great Day until you do, or just learn to keep quiet in the shadows where you can’t do any harm.
Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, August 10, 2007 at 02:21 PM | #
Even though some Jews may hate Europeans, I believe it’s not in the majority. Am I naive? I don’t think so. If it’s true that Jews have so much power as it’s said, and if they’re so smart… Then why shouldn’t we work WITH them? Wouldn’t that help Europeans too? Why be enemy with those who have so much power?
You are correct, An European Girl.
The fact is, Jews live in an immoral and corrupt society, but also an information-intensive society in which cognitively superior people ascend the hierarchy of rewards, and in which, therefore, Jews have a tendency to rise, and less intelligent peoples to sink. Outclassing cognitively unfavoured races in the upper strata of a corrupt civilisation, Jews appear corrupt to the simple-minded antisemite who does not understand the nature and structure of Western civilisation.
Jewish participation in the race-realist movement is of great value to us. Not only do Jews share a cultural heritage with the West, not only are they an ally against the Mohammedan enemy, but their participation would repulse the antisemitic fringe element that plagues our movement. The inclusion of antisemites only solidifies and reinforces in the public mind the erroneous association that exists between race-realism and Nazism. The antisemites, therefore, must be expelled, excluded, and driven into exile. No exceptions, no comprises.
I saw the site and with enthusiasm began taking it in. I thought I had found a great resource in our cause and instead find excuses for jews. Good luck with that.
Disappointed,
It seems that you’re looking for excuses not to support activists who agree with you on most issues. That mentality aids those who disagree with you about everything. Good luck with that!
Please clarify your view(s) on the jews. Maybe this will help clear things up a bit.
Disappointed,
I’ve written two articles about Jewish issues: Did the Jews Do It? and The Insanity of David Duke. There’s also comments about Jews and liberalism in Class and Racial Liberalism.
Basically, as I explain in the first article, I recognize that there have been historical antagonisms between Jews and Gentiles that have been harmful to the US. However, I think laying the lion’s share of the blame for mass immigration and the loss of white racial consciousness on Jews is mistaken and pernicious. I also think the racial right abounds in blood libels on Jews, as my article on Duke makes clear.
I glanced over your “articles” and I am not going to attempt to argue my point(s). Suffice it to say, if you are going to take little to no issue on the jews, then you are not complete in your views and cause. Did all jews do it? No. It is insane to suggest something that absurd, just as it is to blame every single person within a racial group. However, I so strongly disagree with your position and your divisive role that I will certainly not support you. As a matter of fact if someone I know does stumble across your little site, I will do all I can to stear them away from it’s disinformation. Have fun at synagogue.
Disappointed,
So you consider me divisive, but not David Duke. That’s a peculiar perspective on the world.
I have the same opinion, as Mr. Ian Jobling has. I desire to preserve the White Caucasian race, and I view the Jews as White. I am sickened by calls to destroy the Jews and anti-Semitic propaganda.
I have good news and bad news on White Preservation and protecting the Jews.
Preservation: The Bad news is that our numbers are plumetting, fast! But the good news is that Whites will wake up, if and when our economy collapses (Note: I don’t necessarily want an economic depression.) and when the numbers become more obvious.
Jewish Safety: When our economy crashes, our battle with the anti-Semites will officially begin. With enough disinformation, White Gentiles may be tempted to blame Jews for everything (remember Nazi Germany, during its Depression?), especially as it will be easier to blame a separate ethnic (even if intra-racial) group, than oneself. This is the bad news for the Jews, but they can survive with us, White Gentiles.
Pro-White Jews must disassociate with the ADL and SPLC, on racial matters (if not altogether), until they transform or disband. Condemn Abe Foxman for hurting his people’s survival! I don’t know if Morris Dees is Jewish, but it wouldn’t hurt, to condemn him too. I am not saying this, as a precondition. I already accept pro-White Jews; but doing this may help prevent anti-Semitic attacks from others. (Maybe start a “Jews Against Abe Foxman” or “Jews Against Decadent Hollywood Movies” types of organizations).
White Gentiles should condemn David Duke’s anti-Semitism, and Jews should take sides against even the anti-White parts of Jewish Hollywood and Mainstream Media. People will remember this, and it will not go unrewarded.
It is undeniable that many Jews are killing the White race, even disproportionately, regarding the Media. But that is it; individual Jews, not all Jews. Mark them as individuals, not the Jewish people themselves. Jews should say “Abe Foxman, you are destroying our race, hurting our relations with the White Gentiles, and supporting massive non-White immigration. Now stop doing that!” I support the ADL protecting Jews, but trying to stop all pro-White voices must be addressed.
A website/organization should be started, solely to promote positive White Gentile-Jewish relations.
We must unite against the Neo-Nazis and the anti-White Gentile Jews. Time for the White Gentiles and Jews to unite!
Note to Jews: Disregard Erica’s comment. She doesn’t back up her statements with any rational evidence. Her comment is merely her own opinion, without any objective reasoning backing it up. We humans are sight-oriented animals. Our sight is superior to all other species’s. And our detection of various races is almost 100% accurate. This alone can be a deciding factor of race. Now, all of the Jews I have seen, I deem to be White, with my sight. The same sight that makes me want to keep my genes White, is the same that would allow inter-mixing with Jews.
Also don’t be ashamed of being studious. You are very intelligent, as grades and Education Degrees demonstrate ability to absorb information while learning (which is not universial to all people equally).
Erica,
I am a European American and my eyes are Green, so am I not White?
(I have no documentation of non-White ancestry, by the way.)
And Carolyn Brady,
Yes, many Jews have betrayed our race, but not all have. Very few have done what you mentioned. And, how do you explain the self-hating Europeans?
I will concede that most Jews are probably racially liberal, but that is only because of the current political stream. They are constantly reminded of the Holocaust, which was conducted by Europeans/White Gentiles. So, they are trained to hate pro-White activism; keeping this in mind, it really shows how committed pro-White Jews actually are! They are very loyal and praise-worthy for doing what is right (even though it’s in their best interest to preserve the European people).
Typical Liberal Jews are generally not as alert to anti-White activism. The tide will very quickly change, though! Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims will make the typical WW 2 German look apathetic and unenthusiastic.
this is ridiculous. i cannot believe people are arguing for the preservation of the white race. big fucking deal. there’s so much going on in the world today, i cannot believe that somebody is fighting for such a ridiculous cause. why must you identify people by race? the white race is not the only race seemingly on the verge of extinction as you claim the Japanese are now experiencing underpopulation and what about the Palestinians (i have no intention whatsoever to get into the whole Israel/Palestinian issue) but my point being, why must you identify people by race? yes the world is on the verge of becoming one multicultural society, but that is how globalization works so deal with it. its not only affecting the white race but every other race out there. again, why is this such a big issue. there are far bigger issues to be concerned about, and i feel such a hypocrite to be riled up over this ridiculous website when there are far bigger issues out there like tackling global warming or poverty or child soldiers, human trafficking and slavery honestly, big fucking deal. this is the world today, we are globalizing and becoming one multicultural society. open your mind to the differences. accept that this is a world shared with millions of others of different colors, shapes, sizes, beliefs, and move on.
The world is not becoming multicultural. Like many liberal/lefty types you seem to think “the world” stops at America’s borders, or at least the borders of white countries.
In fifty years, on current trends, China will still be ruled by people of Chinese descent. Japan will be ruled by Japanese, Mexico by Mexicans, Nigeria by Nigerians, and so on throughout the non-white world. But in the UK (where I live) the native white population will share their country with a majority of blacks and (Indian) Asians, and our white children will have lost the security, freedom, and identity that will still be taken for granted by the Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans, Nigerians, etc. No-one complains that Japan wants to preserve its ethnic make up, and the world would become a less diverse and less interesting place if Japan just became like everywhere else. So why can’t we have a white England, for the sake of diversity too?
Furthermore, I once mistook an animal rights (Save the Whales, I think) demo on the telly for a demonstration by the British National Party, because every face in the crowd was white. My point is that only white people show concern for animal rights, or the environment, or human rights and other “progressive” issues. Generally, women are treated far more as equals in white countries than in non-white countries. White people (fools in my opinion, but let’s not go there) are the only people who volunteer to go to Africa to help starving blacks. You don’t see any Japanese or Indian volunteers, only whites.
It would seem to me that only white people are losing their countries - becoming “multicultural” - as you call it, which really means becoming backward and taking on aspects of the Third World. Yet, with their high standards of living and quality of life compared to the rest of the world, coupled with the white man and woman’s intelligence and generous (to a fault)nature it would seem that white nations are the nations the world could least afford to lose.
People that believe race and ethnicity are not important don’t understand history. I have 2 examples. RWANDA (1994): Ethnic and political tensions caused the mass killing of hundreds of thousands of Tutsis by Hutu militia. Hutus and Tutsis are the two black ethnic groups living in Rwanda. YUGOSLAVIA (1991) was considered a model of how to build a multinational state and was conformed by Serbs, Croats, Muslims, Slovenes, Albanians, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Hungarians. After a severe economic crisis, ethnic tensions increased, the civil war began and the country disintegrated in 6 states: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia. Now, I wonder what will happen to the United States in 50 years. Will they remain as one nation sharing the same interests, culture and traditions? I’m sure China, which is 92% Han (Han is also the largest ethnic group in the world), will replace the U.S.A. as the next superpower. We will be witnesses of the end of an era. I’m already feeling nostalgic :(
America’s problem is that it has no real roots. That is why it has broken down and globalism has won. But I do not think globalism will defeat the nations that have roots going back to far before the year zero.
The ethnic continuity of the nations of Europe is surprisingly strong. I think people tell us globalism is inevitable because they want greedy American ideology spread around the world. But the facts clearly show that the demographics of Europe are still solid. You can genetically test someone, and usually match them to their nationality.
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2008/02/huge-paper-on-human-genetic.html
No, your eyes aren’t deceiving you. This paper is proof positive that European ethnicities can be distinguished from each other genetically.
The diagram that was referenced
The roots are deeper than liberals imagine. I think globalism will fail to duplicate its own success in America for that reason. Globalists have won the battle, but they will not win the war.
1n73rs73ll4r writes: “why must you identify people by race?”
Because everyone else does too!
Why must imbecilic leftists and “progressives” point to the underperformance of “Blacks” as evidence of White racism?
Why does “affirmative action” exist at all?
1n73rs73ll4r, do you understand what we truly seek? We are a distinct people who seek to preserve all distinct peoples. Biodiversity is our goal. We have a right to prefer our own race, as we are more genetically similar to those of our race, than those who are not. We are also equal opporunists, believing that all distinct peoples have a principal and non-negotiable right to self-preservation.
1n73rs73ll4r writes,
why must you identify people by race? Since every race besides Whites identifies by race we will be consumed if we do not start sticking up for our culture and history.
yes the world is on the verge of becoming one multicultural society.
No, only White lands are becoming multicultural societies. Every other race protects what is theirs.
there are far bigger issues out there like tackling global warming or poverty or child soldiers, human trafficking and slavery
These are issues pushed by Whites. When our power has diminished further we will be unable to affect any of these issues.
I am of partial Jewish descent, but also have an equal amount of WASP ancestry. I have been raised Christian (Episcopalian) and both of my parents are conservative, as am I. While I disagree with Jews religiously, and tend to have different political views than most Jews (most Jews are liberal) I don’t understand why David Duke would hate someone like myself. I have straight light brown hair, green eyes, and fair skin. The notion that I am not white is laughable to say the least. Even the Nazi’s gave some Mischlinges German blood certificates so some of these White Nationalist’s/Neo-Nazi’s should reconsider some of their stances. Erica, mtDNA evidences in European Jews are not good at proving that Jews origins are middle-eastern. The Y chromosome on many European Jews can be traced to the middle east and is distinct from the rest of the European populations. So, what you meant was not mitochondrial evidence, but Y chromosal evidence. Also, if blue eyes are what Aryans have, why do so many fully Jewish people I know have blue eyes? Jack, take a look at the definition of White people: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/white+people
Welcome and success in your good work. (Actually, the name should be The World Right-Side Up. It’s the other guys who’ve inverted it.)