The Great Silencing
By • 10/10/08 |
Whites are terrified of criticizing minorities. |
Recently, many Republicans have been complaining bitterly about John McCain’s failure to take advantage of many of Barack Obama’s obvious weaknesses. In particular, why has the McCain campaign ignored Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s white-bashing pastor? Today, McCain finally released an ad revealing Obama’s history with the disgraced minority activist group ACORN, which pressured banks to make risky loans and has a history of voter registration fraud. But why did it take McCain so long to raise this association when it is so embarrassing for Obama? And why hasn’t McCain used the financial crisis as an occasion to denounce affirmative action, which is deeply unpopular with voters? After all, government policies that pressure banks to make loans on easier terms to non-whites than whites are certainly a form of affirmative action.
McCain’s avoidance of these topics is an example of the great silence on racial issues that leukophobia, or the fear and loathing of white people, forces on America. As we saw in a previous article, leukophobia attributes to whites a uniquely racist, intolerant, greedy, and violent nature. So entrenched are these hostile stereotypes in the minds of Americans, and particularly of the elites, that any white who criticizes non-whites is immediately suspect. It is as though criticism of minorities were the thin end of a wedge that will end in lynchings and genocide. This paranoia is particularly pronounced when it comes to Republicans, since they are, in Howard Dean’s words, the “white, Christian party.”
Leukophobia makes fundamental issues of race entirely unmentionable. The most momentous problem in America today is the coming of white minority status, a process that will bring with it enormous changes and conflict. Yet the demographic transition is virtually never mentioned by politicians, and, when it is, always welcomed as a wonderful boon.
Imagine this scenario. Someone in last week’s town hall debate between Barack Obama and John McCain, in which the candidates answered questions from the audience, stands up and asks, “According to the Census Bureau, white people will become a minority in the US by 2042. Given these demographic trends and the widespread acceptance of interracial marriage, American whites will probably cease to exist as a distinct people within two or three centuries. Senators McCain and Obama, do you believe the extinction of the white race in America is a good thing?”
Of course, the people responsible for vetting the audience for the debate would never allow such a wild-eyed maniac in. However, if one did manage to get past the gatekeepers, how would the candidates react? They might well refuse to answer. If they did, they would no doubt brush the questioner off with a few stern words about intolerance and racism and do their best to move on quickly. No matter how reasonable it is, our elites put concern for white survival on par with neo-Nazism.
Leukophobia not only prevents the discussion of fundamental racial issues but also more superficial ones. Consider the regime of censorship that the McCain campaign has imposed on its own supporters. Last month, Didi Lima, a Hispanic Republican Party official who was working for McCain, was removed from her post for saying, “I’m very much afraid that the Democratic Party is going to do [to Hispanics] the same thing that they did with the African-American culture and make them all dependent on the government and we don’t want that.” A McCain spokesman said Lima’s comments “are not tolerated on [McCain’s] campaign.” Apparently, Republicans are no longer allowed to notice high black poverty and welfare dependence rates.
Similarly, some young immigration restrictionists attending the Republican National Convention were told to take down a sign saying “Build a Fence” by the Secret Service on the orders of the Republican Control Room. Signs reading “Viva McCain” were welcome, however.
Of course, none of this discourages the liberal media, who accuse Republicans of racism on the most contrived of pretexts. When Sarah Palin impugned Barack Obama for “palling around with terrorists” like William Ayers, an Associated Press article called the remark “racially tinged,” despite the fact that Ayers is white. When McCain put out an ad comparing Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, the New York Times accused him of appealing to whites’ fears of interracial sex.
The very racial makeup of the Republican Party is enough to put some commentators on edge. Thus, Harold Meyerson of the Washington Post called the Republican National Convention “shockingly—unAmericanly—white.” Last month The Huffington Post’s Nora Ephron seethed, “I forget how white [Republicans] are, and mean-spirited, and thin-lipped.” For these commentators, the very whiteness of the Republican Party renders it suspect and dangerous. A more consummate expression of leukophobia could scarcely be imagined. When they are pilloried for the color of their skin, no wonder Republicans are afraid to complain about Jeremiah Wright.
A recent experiment performed by psychologists shows that whites are nervous about even mentioning race when talking to non-whites, even when race is crucial to the conversation. “Whites are strategically avoiding the topic of race because they’re worried that they’ll look bad if they admit they notice it in other people,” said one of the researchers.
This week, we witnessed the terrible consequences of the great silencing. After all, the current financial crisis and terrifying stock market crash are in part due to America’s failure to confront racial reality. Given their tendency to seek immediate gratification regardless of long-term costs, blacks and Hispanics are naturally worse credit risks than whites are. Thus America’s decades-long effort to create a world in which “the improvident races” have rates of home ownership equal to that of whites was a sure way to destroy the credit markets. If America were capable of confronting hard truths about race, we would all likely be better off today.
No matter how much money we may be losing as a result of the financial crisis, and no matter how devastating the long-term effects on our economy, it is impossible for a race realist to watch the current debacle without some degree of satisfaction. A country that silences fundamental truths deserves to crash. We are finally seeing a castle built upon the sands of cowardice and wishful thinking crack at the foundations. Hopefully, a more courageous and honest nation will emerge from the rubble.
If you want this article to be exposed to a wide audience, take the time to recommend it at digg. Millions of readers traffic the site, and the more recommendations an article gets, the better its chance of being read. If you don't have digg account yet, registration is easy. Just click submit to get started. |
Click here to join the White America mailing list. You'll get an e-mail notice whenever White America publishes new entries.
No matter how much money we may be losing as a result of the financial crisis, and no matter how devastating the long-term effects on our economy, it is impossible for a race realist to watch the current debacle without some degree of satisfaction. A country that silences fundamental truths deserves to crash. We are finally seeing a castle built upon the sands of cowardice and wishful thinking crack at the foundations. Hopefully, a more courageous and honest nation will emerge from the rubble.”
Amen. That statement was music to my ears. Liberal America engineers liberalism, now liberal America (both Democrats and Republicans) can rot because of it. Hopefully a better country will be built on the ashes of liberal America.
I think your article hits the nail right on the head.
I can’t believe so many white people are ‘conditioned’ to be silent. If the opposite would be true the minorities have a field day and people lose jobs, chances, and get a black eye in the press.
I can’t believe Obama’s pastor and Obama’s denial of ever hearing white bashing from his preacher isn’t still at the forefront of this presidential run.
We need a strong strategy to give white people the ‘racial awakening’ they need.
Ian, I think this is one of your best written and concise articles to date! Having read your articles for the last several months I completely agree with the positions that you espouse. All of these articles only reach a small majority however… so I would like to propose that you (perhaps under your new white america project) produce an ‘Al Gore’ style video. I strongly believe that the message needs to be put to the masses in a much more visual format (e.g. Al Gore’s wonderful pie charts). YouTube is a simple and cost-effective vessel for such a video and we desperately need a larger portion of the general public to recognize the magnitude of the problem. The Liberal media has Hollywood films and news outlets so we really need to stand on the same platform to argue our case…
I agree with Mark. This is a good article.
And I also agree that the peculiar direction this election has taken is satisfying. I find satisfaction in two different places. First, the Clintons made their way to the White House as race hustlers. Bill Clinton was even called the first black president—was. Now blacks don’t want anything to do with them.
The implications of this state of affairs can’t be lost on the Clintons. They’re smart enough to see that betraying their own race for personal gain is a losing policy, even if neither will admit it.
John McCain has also been a political correctness enforcer. He criticized George Bush in 2000 for giving a speech at Bob Jones University. He also condemned the battle flag as a racist symbol (which is why my battle flag is gloriously flapping in the breeze as I write this).
In both cases I must admit I do derive a certain bitter satisfaction that the swordsmen are the ones getting stuck.
I simply don’t understand why so many well-meaning whites are deathly afraid of being called racist. It is just too easy to deflect this silly insult.
Jared Taylor has some good techniques for fending off such attacks. I have another one that works very well: When I’m called a racist, I ask my accuser if he was the kid who told me I had cooties on the playground in grade school. It makes them look like the petulant, spoiled children such people are. And it shuts them up.
We really need to go on the verbal offensive.
Dr. Jobling,
There is an important element to this silencing - actually the foundation - that needs to be highlighted. And, although you mention the element as do most authors, you also do not highlight it. The fear of speaking out is not often caused by a potential conflict with blacks or browns or yellows, but more often by the lack of support from our own. The traitor who automatically sides with the minority regardless of how truthful your words may be. Or equally bad, the one who says nothing and walks away.
I encountered a situation last week in a grocery store. I got on line and a black woman slithered in front of me. I confronted her. As we were going back and forth, a black man came over and stood by the black woman. It did not appear that they knew each other and when we stopped our squabble, he walked away. Now, we all know why he was there. Do you think any white would ever back me up like that? Sadly, we all know the answer. I am a white woman and I was willing to defend myself despite being alone in a store with many minorities. What the hell is wrong with our men?
Miss Scarlett is 100% right - we white men have deteriorated into a despicably craven caste. However, it took many years to reach this stage, and it will not be turned around over night. Which is why my concept of pro-white activism entails an incremental approach to be carried out over several years.
One thing we can do RIGHT NOW, if allowed by law, is to carry a personal firearm. Last year I took advantage of Virginia’s Right To Carry statute and now tote a loaded Magnum .357 in my laptop carry bag wherever I go - particularly on the DC Metro. I cannot describe the feeling of liberation it provides from any confrontation with dark-skinned brutes, who,despite their basement IQs, know darn well whitey will always slink away from confrontation. While this solution may not be for everyone, those of us who have had experience with firearms - I retired from the Army - should be prepared to protect ourselves and fellow whites who are threatened or come under attack.
We should also consider the postive aspect of surprise being a force multiplier. Many of these black and Hispanic toughs are simply not counting on the tables being turned on them. For example, a few months ago one of three dark brown Mestizos or full blood Indians - no doubt all illeglals - attempted to stare me down as I left a local supermaket. I glowered back and yelled, “What the ‘F’ are you looking at, muchacho?” He immediately broke eye contact and looked down.
I will tell you, my fellow whites, many of these minority thugs are cowardly bullies who will back down when confronted with a white man prepared to defend himself.
Ed G
Miss Scarlet, first as bad as it is, you did the right thing. Most whites no longer have any sense of their own, and I don’t count on help from other whites either. But I assure you that at least in the South, chivalry isn’t completely dead—at least not as long as I’m around.
One reason more men don’t behave in a chivalrous manner is that women don’t appreciate it. But if you’re suggesting most white men should be ashamed of themselves over their cowardly behavior, I’ll agree with you.
I also agree with the advice on carrying a weapon if legal, but don’t do so unless you are properly trained in their use. It’s not as easy as it’s made to look on TV.
“… do you believe the extinction of the white race in America is a good thing?”
Aside from the radioactive nature of the question for politicians, I’m not sure how the typical liberal would see this. I have heard the response, “So what?” This reflects the typical white American, who has been brainwashed to believe race does not exist and that ancestry is not part of his identity (if indeed he has any sense of identity left at all). I have also heard, “The white race can take care of itself.” Not sure what that means; and it is demonstrably false, at least in the last 40 years. But the hypothetical question about extinction is a good line of argument: it forces liberals into a corner.
But as things are going now, I don’t see how anything but partition can save the white race in America. There are already so many non-whites in the country, and their fertility is such that they will eventually have the votes to set immigration policy to their liking. Even with strong laws and social taboos against miscegenation, whites will be absorbed. There will always be a leakage, gene flow into a white population living amongst large numbers of non-whites. The only thing that can work is large scale geographic separation; not just from neighborhood to neighborhood, but on the scale of countries.
The reason whites are afraid to voice justifiable, truthful criticism of minorities is it is considered taboo. This issue has been made taboo due to the indoctrination started in kindergarten lasting through the highest levels of post-secondary education. To show how Caucasian people who haven’t been brainwashed react to blacks , I give you 100% Caucasian Mexican citizens beginning with the Former Mexican President Vincente Fox. In a speech justifying the “right” of Mexican illegal aliens to work in the USA, he said (I’m paraphrasing)” Mexicans only take jobs Americans won’t do. These are jobs EVEN BLACKS WON’T TAKE”. I just spent several days beginning a new job taking over from a Mexican-American born in Mexico. He invited me to his home and has no reluctance voicing negative statements about blacks, no white would to someone they didn’t know. For example, he said ” My wife likes this area mainly because there are no blacks here”.
There’s a lot of discussion of this article—34 comments, in fact—on its Digg page if you’re interested.
The realization that other people,”minorities”etc.have unique group concerns that excludes “whites” is the beginning of maturity and enlightenment on what multiculturalism really means.
No, I think a mature and enlightened understanding of multiculturalism lies in grasping that it is a pack of lies designed to defraud whites of their homeland.
Dr. Jobling:
I think both you and Bobby make some good points.
Although I suspect Bobby is a race fantasist liberal and would disagree with me, if I take his comment at face value, I think it is true. Non-white cultures do have perfectly legitimate interests separate from white cultures, and vice versa.
Implicit in his point is the need to separate white from non-white cultures to avoid needless conflict. Attempting to integrate different cultures can only lead to one prevailing over the other or the destruction of both.
And you make a good point that as practiced, multiculturalism is a charade used by liberals to deny the legitimacy of white cultures the world over.
I see this distinction as being more than academic. First, it makes for excellent talking points when sparring with leukophobes. Second, the failure to recognize that non-whites have their own interests and values leads to tragedy and the worst sorts of blunders.
Iraq is a great example. The latest war aim there is to democratize Iraq. Because elites operate under your operant definition of multiculturalism, they refuse even to consider that democracy may be incompatible with Muslim cultures. And because our leukophobic elites are using multiculturalism to deny the reality of the cultures found in Iraq, they assume that groups in Iraq can be made to stop hating each other once they are made to democratize.
My point isn’t to argue over the validity of the invasion. But I do take issue with the operant assumptions that are employed in the current policy. I find them to be based upon flawed premises.
The other sacred doctrine of multiculturalism is the equality of all cultures. I do think that an argument can be made that all Western cultures are objectively superior to all African cultures. But this superiority does not justify delegitimizing others’ cultures. We are all part of our cultures for better or worse.
We should insist that both white and non-white cultures are legitimate, and hence need to be separated from each other. To me that’s real multiculturalism.
Any comments or thoughts?
“Critizing minorities” is a euphemism Ian Jobling uses in this article for “inciting hatred and violence against minorities.”
The whole purpose of his blog is to pit whites against blacks, Muslims, and other minorities deemed “unfit” to participate in American society. Inciting racial tensions should be criminally prosecuted. It should be banned by the constitution.
Hopefully the day will come and I will live to see it when you personally are legally tried, found guilty, and shot for inciting ethnic strife.
Anti-Racist Action wants me to be shot! He sounds like an Obama fan. We may be hearing a lot more from people like him over the next few years.
It sounds as if he wants all of us shot simply because he has no legitimate response to our valid, sound ideas. He also doesn’t sound very bright. It’s just as likely that such violence would be visited upon the censors and Stalinists as upon those of us who believe in freedom and democracy. And I’m sure he wouldn’t want to be shot himself.
I don’t wish the same on him. I’d rather defeat him with ideas, but that’s not a fair fight either.
Combat your “ideas”? I could debunk every word you have written on your detested website, but I am not obliged to combat your propaganda; and since deep down you know that everything I have written about you is true, combatting your preposterous “ideas” would only serve to gratify my ego, which however does not respond to such flattery.
The whole purpose of your blog is to pit the “races” against one another, to incite strife and disorder in our society, to thwart class solidarity and international unity, an act for which in an enlightened community you would be criminally prosecuted.
Since it would be futile to appeal to your morality, for no one with any moral sensibility would countenance the white supremacist ideology of which you are an adherent, I hope I can at least appeal to your self-interest. America is no longer a “white” country. There is nothing you can do to thwart the tide of human progress. Adjust yourself to this fact, and perhaps your false discontents may be alleviated.
http://antiracistleague.blogspot.com/
“Combat your “ideas”? I could debunk every word you have written on your detested website, but I am not obliged to combat your propaganda; and since deep down you know that everything I have written about you is true, combatting your preposterous “ideas” would only serve to gratify my ego, which however does not respond to such flattery.”
I’ll make a deal with you: If you can give me clear-cut,cogent, compelling reasons why our ideas are wrong, I’ll join your cause. I’m here because I think these people are right. Convince me they are wrong.
“I could debunk every word you have written on your detested [detested by whom?] website, but I am not obliged to combat your propaganda …”
A windy concession speech.
“and since deep down you know that everything I have written about you is true, …”
A begged question. We know no such thing, nor have you attempted even the rudiments of an argument.
“combatting your preposterous [begged question] “ideas” would only serve to gratify my ego, which however does not respond to such flattery.”
You clearly respond to the sort of flattery you bestow upon yourself. Since you admit not to having a real argument, your appearance here is nothing but a childish, self-congratulatory gesture. Why should anyone take it seriously?
“The whole purpose of your blog is to pit the “races” against one another, to incite strife and disorder in our society, to thwart class solidarity and international unity”
The purpose of the blog is to engender in white people a clear sense of the danger they and their civilization face. I doubt whether you have these sorts of qualms when blacks, Asians or mestizos are the object of racial activism or unity. Do you peddle this sophomoric twaddle on the Nation of Islam website, or that of the NAACP?
“… an act for which in an enlightened community you would be criminally prosecuted.”
“Enlightened” communities do not execute people for expressing opinions. The sort of totalitarian society for which you yearn does, of course. Inside every marxoid sophomore is a Torquemada yearning to get out.
“I hope I can at least appeal to your self-interest.”
The self-interest of white people is exactly what is at issue. How is that interest served by acquiescence in the transformation of the United States into a third-world cesspool? Why should this development be applauded instead of opposed?
“There is nothing you can do to thwart the tide of human progress.”
Two begged questions.
1) In what sense is the third-world tsunami bearing down upon the US “progress?” By what measurable standard? There is a short-term benefit for the non-whites, of course, as they emigrate from nations which by our standards are failures, but why should we, whose nation this supposedly is, put the interests of third-world aliens above those of our own people and families? Ask China or India why they don’t accept floods of aliens into their nations.
2) In addition, appeals to fantasies like inexorable “tides of human progress” are just silly. No one with even a rudimentary understanding of history would claim that any historical development is inevitable or irresistable.
Combat your “ideas”? I could debunk every word you have written on your detested website,http://antiracistleague.blogspot.com/, but I am not obliged to combat your propaganda; and since deep down you know that everything you have written is false, combatting your preposterous “ideas” would only serve to gratify my ego, which however does not respond to such flattery.
The whole purpose of your blog is to pit the “races” against Whites, to incite strife and disorder in our society, to thwart White solidarity and our international unity, an act for which in an enlightened community you would be criminally prosecuted.
Since it would be futile to appeal to your morality, for no one with any moral sensibility would countenance the anti-white ideology of which you are an adherent, I hope I can at least appeal to your self-interest. America may soon no longer be a “white” country. Adjust yourself to this fact, and perhaps your false discontents may be alleviated.
“Combat your ‘ideas’? I could debunk every word you have written on your detested website”
Please do. I suspect you cannot or will not argue, however. You seem like nothing more than an angry ball of ideology. Instead of reason, your tool is the gun: just shoot what you hate. End of “argument”.
I wonder if Anti-Racist League would bring Jeremiah Wright to trial for inciting ethnic strife? Please, Anti Racist League, tell us. What is your stance on the good reverend?
I’m a non-white living in Latin America but I consider valid your concerns about immigration. Nobody can deny a country the right to establish their own immigration policies according to their interests (quotas?). Ironically, the best way to preserve human diversity is avoiding to convert our world into a “melting pot”. Every culture and ethnic group of our world should be preserved. I’m not happy to know that whites will become extinct in a not so far future, they built in North America a nation of democracy and freedom, whose principles were followed by the world. P.S: In Japan 98% of their population is pure Japanese and that cultural and ethnic homogeneity is their strenght.
“The whole purpose of his blog is to pit whites against blacks, Muslims, and other minorities deemed “unfit” to participate in American society. Inciting racial tensions should be criminally prosecuted. It should be banned by the constitution.
Hopefully the day will come and I will live to see it when you personally are legally tried, found guilty, and shot for inciting ethnic strife.
By Anti-Racist Action on 10/16/08 at 2:37 pm”
By this post alone, you have proved yourself unfit to participate in American society. But thanks for letting us know the prevailing opinion of the enlightened forces of tolerance, hope, and change.
“The whole purpose of your blog is to pit the “races” against one another, to incite strife and disorder in our society, to thwart class solidarity and international unity, an act for which in an enlightened community you would be criminally prosecuted.”
Spoken like a Central/South American white elite. No doubt when the US slides into second world status you imagine yourself being a leader of the de-cultured, directionless multi-cultural masses.
First, I’d like to thank my white brothers and sisters for their intelligent comments. (What is race but extended family?)
Second, I’d like to say, Ian, interesting post.
——— The white patriot’s Coat of Arms: gens alba conservanda est (the white race must be preserved)
I don’t agree that most white males are cowardly, history would dispute this idea soundly. It’s that we have been conditioned here in the US, brain washed, since birth that blacks or anyone of color are to be given leeway, noblis oblige must always apply when in disputes, the right of way of passage goes to the black if they are entering the out door going in, if you are white they come in before you go out,when crossing in aisles in stores the black always has the right of way, etc. This applies though out our society no matter what the situation. The media constantly blares this minorities’ privilege in all situation. If you don’t adhere to it and you are a white male you will be branded for life as a bigot, a racist, and a white supremacist and you could easily be charged with a hate crime. Goodbye career, family, friends, and security.
Why should Whites worry about becoming a minority say by 2042, or even earlier if it happens? Why don’t other races share similar concerns? White separatism is nothing but a direct descendant of White supremacy i.e. living in the false belief Whites are somewhat superior to other races and have a natural right to feel entitled. For 3500 out of 4000 years in human history, Semites, Arabs, Indians, Chinese etc. dominated world civilization. It’s only last 200 years that White Europeans (and specifically Britons, French, Germans and Spaniards) made such a huge difference to all the technological progress we surround us. Definitely, it’s something to be proud of and cherished. But, only a fool would imply that greatness should eliminate through interracial breeding.
If Western nations are falling behind today, it’s not because of non-White citizens inside their territory but because many Whites have become accustomed to a comfortable life provided by high living standards and are loath to educating themselves and toiling hard like their grandparents. Simply put, many Whites have become lazy and dysfunctional because of easy money. This gives ample opportunity for citizens in third world country to play catch. The pursuit of hedonism is what has brought the slow deterioration of Western nations. A disease which is yet to catch hold of countries like Japan.
Let me ask you a question. Do you know there are close to 3 million non-Japanese living in Japan? That is more than 2% of their population. Do you ever see the Japanese moaning about the foreigners in their presence? Did you ever hear of Japan passing anti-miscegnation laws to protect the purity of the “Japanese race”? In fact, mixed race Japanese are well-accepted in Japanese society (except for Black Japanese who have some discrimination issues). You should consider travelling to Europe. Europeans rarely identify each other as “White” in relation to non-Whites. To a proud German living in Bavaria, a non-White foreigner invites similar suspicion as a White Pole or Italian. Historically, there was nothing called the White race. People tended to identify each other according to the ethnic group they belonged to i.e. Bavarian, Sicilian, Celtic, Cornish etc. The term “White” was first coined in relation to racial differences between White Americans and negro slaves. This was in effect to perpetuating a system of subordination which has since, 1865 lost legal basis. Your fears of a White country being overwhelmed by Brown people is misplaced and unrealistic.
Grow up, Ian. We don’t suffer from “leucophobia”. But, you do have some White superiority complex which is nothing but an unhealthy obsession with the color of your skin. Don’t you have any other achievement in life that you have to fall back on your skin color to feel better about yourself? It’s nothing but a mass of tissue with lower melanin protection. As far as other “White” features such as straight hair, straight nose, angular face etc. may I remind you they’re pretty common in other races as well. One only needs to observe keenly.
“Do you ever see the Japanese moaning about the foreigners in their presence? Did you ever hear of Japan passing anti-miscegnation laws to protect the purity of the “Japanese race”?”
I lived in Japan for 2 years; both the mainland and Okinawa. I can directly attest to the Japanese xenophobia. Rightly so, if you ask me. We could learn a lot about maintaining our society from the Japanese.
“Why should Whites worry about becoming a minority say by 2042, or even earlier if it happens? Why don’t other races share similar concerns?”
Can you name me one country where diversity hasn’t led to mass conflict? The only one I know of is Switzerland, and they’ve always been a confederation rather than a unified nation.
As far as other races sharing similar concerns, can you name me one non-white country with open borders? Can you name me one non-white country that wants its ethnic composition changed?
“White separatism is nothing but a direct descendant of White supremacy i.e. living in the false belief Whites are somewhat superior to other races and have a natural right to feel entitled.”
Can you name me one group that doesn’t feel superior to other groups? It’s pretty obvious to me that you feel superior to the people in this room. What would make you think we’re going to feel any differently about our group? You show me a group that takes no pride in itself and I’ll show you a group that isn’t long for this world.
As far as feeling “entitled”, yes, I do feel entitled to a country of my own that is shared by only my people. It sounds to me as if you’re counseling death and destruction to whites. Do you tell other groups they have no right to take pride in their people and accomplishments?
“For 3500 out of 4000 years in human history, Semites, Arabs, Indians, Chinese etc. dominated world civilization.”
The mere fact that you would make such an untrue statement belies your hatred of whites. Whites have had superior cultures for fifteen hundred of the last three thousand years (i.e., 500 BC-AD 500 the Greeks and Romans were the premier civilizations; and from AD 500 until the present, white Europeans have had the premier civilizations). I’ll also remind you that the thousand year (500-1500) gap was due to the collapse of Rome. Why did Rome collapse? Because Rome accepted too many immigrants.
What makes you think you can get away with this kind of libel? Do you think none of us have studied history?
“Let me ask you a question. Do you know there are close to 3 million non-Japanese living in Japan? That is more than 2% of their population.”
If that is supposed to justify whites becoming minorities in the civilizations they built and created, you’d best think again. The fact of the matter is that there are Korean families who have lived in Japan for ten generations. They’re still not considered Japanese. They will never be considered Japanese because Japanese have a very healthy sense of who and what they are. Here’s an illustration of my point:
http://www.amren.com/ar/1991/09/
“If Western nations are falling behind today, it’s not because of non-White citizens inside their territory but because many Whites have become accustomed to a comfortable life provided by high living standards and are loath to educating themselves and toiling hard like their grandparents. Simply put, many Whites have become lazy and dysfunctional because of easy money. This gives ample opportunity for citizens in third world country to play catch. The pursuit of hedonism is what has brought the slow deterioration of Western nations.”
The fact is that white Americans put in longer hours, with fewer days off, and are more productive than any other people on the planet. Have you not heard of the Protestant work ethic?
That’s quite a stereotype. I bet you wouldn’t make such a blanket statement about any other group. But phobias against stereotypes are definitely an affliction I don’t share provided the stereotype has a grain of truth in it. Yours is nothing more than a false indictment of whites.
But Third World peoples will never catch up with whites simply because of a much lower level of intelligence than whites and east Asians.
Your assertions above begs the question of why you refuse to recognize racial differences in intelligence. My guess is that you understand that blaming whites for non-white failings accomplishes little other than a very flimsy excuse to attack whites. Guess what? We’re not buying it anymore.
Why do you hate white people so much that you have to make up lies about us?
Anti-Racist:
I think you need a lesson in human history and human nature.
First, you said: “For 3500 out of 4000 years in human history, Semites, Arabs, Indians, Chinese etc. dominated world civilization.”
Just what planet have you been living, AR? Have you forgotten about the Greeks and the Romans, and that those two white civilizations conquered the Semites and Indians you evidently hold in high regard. Failure to acknowledge white achievement is the first sign of leukophobia.
Second, you claim the Japanese are not xenophobic because 2% of the population in Japan is non-Japanese or of mixed ancestry? Wow! 2%! Did you take math in grade school? 2% minority in Japan is at least an order of magnitude less than 35% minority in America. Furthermore, I have been to Japan twice. Don’t tell me the Japanese are not racist. Even the Japanse-American officers with whom I served, complained about the racism of the Japanese. In America, on the other hand, the non-white population is rapidly growing and in just a mere 10 years the majority of children born in the US will be brown or black, and 60% of them will be illegitimate. That, AR, does not a good future portend, especially when you consider the high black-on-white crime rate. Failure to acknowledge the fault of non-whites is a second sympton of leukophobia.
Third, you describe whites today as having:
“become accustomed to a comfortable life provided by high living standards and are loath to educating themselves and toiling hard like their grandparents. Simply put, many Whites have become lazy and dysfunctional because of easy money.”
Again, what planet are you living on? Whites in America today are far more productive and work harder and longer than just about anyone on the planet. Employing anti-white stereotypes devoid of any reality is another sign of leukophobia. In other words, AR, you have leukophobia. I advise you to stay in bed, take two reality tablets to undo the PC brainwashing you have suffered, and do hand strengthening exercises to help you get a grip on reality. Until then, please stop embarrassing yourself.
And by the way, I have lived eight years in Europe, and there is now a growing trend in nationalist groups alarmed at dispossession of indigenous European peoples from their homelands. I speak German, Spanish, and Russian and more and more these nationalistic groups are talking in terms of being white and of white dispossession.
“America is no longer a “white” country. There is nothing you can do to thwart the tide of human progress.”
Anti-racist embodies leukaphobia because he believes that human progress means ridding the country of whites. I thought you were going to debunk Ian Jobling’s ideas…
“Why should Whites worry about becoming a minority say by 2042, or even earlier if it happens? Why don’t other races share similar concerns?”
Kindly name another racial group whose policy encourages and applauds the replacement of themselves by alien races in their own nations.
“Do you know there are close to 3 million non-Japanese living in Japan? That is more than 2% of their population.”
This is the best you can do? Two per cent? That number would be many times higher than 2% if Japan did not explictly design its immigration policy to maintain a Japanese majority.
Anti-racist writes: “But, only a fool would imply that greatness should eliminate through interracial breeding. ”
It’s one factor, and for a race realist, it would also depend on the amount and content of the interbreeding. For example, a huge number of American Whites are part American Indian. But the amount is so small that these Whites don’t look Amerind. By that I mean, a forensic scientist could not discern the Amerind mixture in those American Whites with a Choctaw great great great grandparent, though maybe one day a geneticist could.
I imagine that a subbranch of Whites who were, say about 20% Han Chinese would still look white, and since the Han Chinese are a people who have developed a great civilization, the genetic potential for greatness would not be eliminated. But that isn’t what we’re talking about, is it? We’re really talking about Blacks and Mexicans. Mexicans have had some degree of civilization, but, for the most parts, Black civilization has always been sub par. And even in the West, with affirmative action, blacks have been poor performers in every intellectual field, with the possible exception of music. As much as I wish it weren’t so, and I do wish it, this much lower intellectual ability of blacks is almost certainly genetic. It seems likely that the much higher rate of crime is, too. So, unless you measure greatness by speed at a 100 meter dash or jazz improvisation ability, blacks aren’t a great race. Mestizo Mexicans are harder to judge, and my gut feeling is that they’re smarter than blacks and less criminally inclined, but not at the white level. Ian has some info here which may contradict that, and I’ll sort through that later.
Also, I tend to think that Whites occupy a sweet spot in certain qualities. While East Asians have slightly higher average IQs than whites (not nearly like White-Black difference) and commit less crime on average, I think that lack of aggression in Asians is part of the reason Whites have largely been ahead. Asians appear to be more docile and accept authority more than whites. Would some White/Asian interbreeding create a “better” hybrid? I don’t know. I’m speculating a lot in this paragraph, but it appears plausible to me.
In response to Anti-Racist:
Your opinions appear to miss the point. We don’t think our race is inherently “superior.” We solely want self-preservation. We support the preservation of all peoples. We, Whites are an extended family. Assuming you are White, even you are our distant cousin. If you are White, take it easy, and have an understanding of your people. We don’t seek “supremacy,” and I am sick of having to deal with that fallacy. What is truly at stake is survivial.
Side Note: The Semites who mentioned are White. They form a branch of the White Caucasian race. They are technically different from European-Europeans; however, they are very similar and virtually phenotypically identical. On the borders of their genetic population “borders,” it’s almost like comparing technical Europeans on an ethnic basis. Many Jews (and other Semites) are likely more closely related to many European ethnic groups, than many nominal deep Southern Europeans. I have seen Greeks and Southern Italians who could pass for Brown Hispanics; and I have seen Jews who could pass for Irish, Scottish, German, Slavic, French, and even English.
Wow… Ian, I cannot tell you how refreshing it is to see that there is someone out there willing to speak his mind on this “unspeakable” and publicly unacceptable truth behind America’s diversity. I was recently accused of being an ignorant racist on my own blog for discussing my views on Obama and that, now that the leader of the free world is Black, excuses by the percentage of Blacks who feel entitled (using affirmative action programs, etc) are no longer valid. The problem is, the argument I received was incredibly and thoroughly based on stereotypes that Blacks and other minorities have of Whites (very hypocritical!). (She who criticized hailed from Atlanta, GA (where Blacks are the majority) and had attended an all Black college).
You are absolutely right about the McCain campaign’s fears in nailing Obama on his wrongdoings. I recently read a study from Harvard in which Whites were afraid to acknowledge racial differences at all in front of Blacks. Additionally, they were judged by their Black interviewers as racists simply for avoiding racial differences all together - just as they would have been had they acknowledged the differences. You’re damned if you do, and damned if you don’t! It’s clear to me that Obama would have won regardless of who he was running against for the simple fact that one cannot publicly attack a Black individual without being pegged as a racist.
I would also like to add that, I feel it’s a tragedy that America has sunk to such a low, especially with concern to the overall attitude surrounding the election. No doubt, Obama will be regarded for years to come as a great man in history books… As a military spouse myself, I know of the sacrifices John McCain and his family have made for this country, and trust me, the sacrifices are those not understood by a rookie like Obama. It’s sad, not only for Whites, but especially for Blacks, that their prodigy is such an unqualified, undeserving individual. Today, he represents their race, and that representation illustrates that in this country, the Black man can get twice as much for half the effort. Blacks who are above it… the mere 5% that voted McCain, are probably, or are hopefully ashamed to be a part of their race.
I must agree with Miss Scarlet, that Whites do not stand up for their own like minorities (primarily Blacks) do. I myself had a horrible experience while standing in line in a food court of a San Francisco mall. I was alone in line, and a complete stranger, a young, grungy-looking Black man, came up to me, and gave me a full body hug, rubbing his hands all up and down my backside and pressing his greasy cheek against mine - right there in public! I, for fear of his intentions (he could have had a knife or a gun) did nothing and stood stiff as a board with a look of panic and disgust on my face. 3-4 White men were standing right around me, all watching, and all did NOTHING to help me. I think that White guilt and the “silencing” you speak of could have greatly contributed to such a situation. After all, had he been White… they may have helped me.
Thanks for your candid and courageous articles!
White people need to understand that all their rights have been stolen from them and they are now slaves…slaves in their own country, which their forefathers founded, fought and died for.
Total, complete, 100% SLAVES!
Another great article, Ian!
I am glad that this cowardly self imposed muzzling by John McCain has really brought this phenomenon out into the open for tens of millions of affected white conservatives. Let us remember that back in 2000 this very same John McCain went on the warpath over ONE VISIT George W. Bush made to Bob Jones University. However, now our once former brave Indian Chief John has turned into a wimpering squaw concering Obama’s TWENTY YEAR ASSOCIATION with a racist black church which idolized Farrakahn. I propose we henceforth refer to such cowardly whites as “Uncle Johns,” and apply it to those white people who will criticize each other over trivial matters, but will shake and tremble at the mere thought of talking bad about a black or Hispanic person.
Folks, there is a way to criticize minorities and I do it all the time - even at work, and even in the presence of minorities. However, it takes both chutzpah and showmanship. I quote from Scripture, “All have fallen short of the glory of God” and remind everyone that the fecal matter of all groups emanates an odor - in the physical and behavorial sense. I will always strike the first blow against the hyprocrisy of whites and some of the things they have done, before moving on to darker pastures. But as long as you smile and mainatin a friendly tone of voice, you can get your point across. I also remind people of color that it is racist to think that only whites are bigots.