Principles of the Pro-White Movement
By • 7/7/08 |
A revolution requires a declaration of principles. |
[What follows is an attempt to summarize and synthesize my writings for White America and to formulate a working manifesto for the pro-white movement. I consider this statement a draft to be updated yearly as our conception of the pro-white project changes. I look forward to your suggestions for improvements.]
The state of the white race in the West confronts us with a horror unprecedented in the annals of human history. Demographers predict whites will be a minority in the United States in 40 years and in Western Europe shortly after. Since the West condones interracial breeding, there is a serious prospect that the white race as we know it will disappear in the next two or three centuries.
An even more urgent threat is that whites will lose political control over their ancestral homelands and be put at the mercy of alien races who are unfriendly to our people.
Because culture is rooted in biology, the subjugation or extinction of the white race may well mean the death of Western culture and its fundamental ideals of individualism, pluralism, tolerance, and the rule of law. If the white West is not preserved, it is quite possible that what we today call the Third World will become the whole world, and the light of humanity and progress will be extinguished.
This prospect, while fearsome enough, does not express the full horror of our plight. What gives the situation of whites its uniquely dreadful and grotesque cast is that it is taboo for us to voice any desire for our continued existence. Our current cultural establishment labels “racism” and “hatred” any word of complaint that whites may breathe about their impending subjugation and obliteration. These labels are a slander wicked almost beyond imagining. Indeed, the hatred is on the side of the people who express indifference towards or even eagerness for the destruction of a people.
The pro-white movement is committed to the preservation of the white race and its unique culture. Pro-whites, as the movement’s adherents call themselves, frankly admit that they prefer their own people to others and see no evil in doing so. Pro-whites resemble the Jewish activists who attempted to awake a callous and bigoted world to the prospect of the Holocaust during the Nazi period or Spartans trying to preserve their society from Persian rule.
In furtherance of our goal of racial preservation, the pro-white movement will spread awareness of the threats to the white race and the reasons for preserving it. We will seek to overcome the slanders against our race and our movement that have made it disreputable for whites to defend themselves against extinction. Finally, we will do all in our power to restore to America a government that respects the white race and promotes its interests.
Why Preserve White Societies?
White societies are worth preserving not merely because of the inherent value of ethnic autonomy, but also because of the precious uniqueness of Western culture, which only whites have succeeded in creating.
Scholars have found that Western culture is distinguished by preference for the rule of law, individualism, pluralism, and tolerance. Also, whites have a uniquely powerful urge to discover the objective truth about the world. This urge has led the West far more than other cultures to defend the individual exercise of reason from suppression by state and ecclesiastical authorities. Additionally, the Western taste for the truth has created a culture uniquely capable of self-criticism and innovation in science, technology, philosophy, and the arts.
The unique attributes of Western culture are due in part to whites’ relatively high intelligence and providence, or ability to defer gratification for greater future rewards.
Without the white race, it is quite likely that people would still be living pre-modern despotisms like the ancient Persian or Chinese empires, since more or less all of the technological, scientific, philosophical, and political innovations that led to modernity were accomplished by whites.
Cultural differences among the races are almost certainly in part due to biological differences. Psychologists have found that the black-white IQ gap, the most intensively studied racial difference, is certainly genetic in origin. It is the consensus among behavior geneticists that personality traits are about 50 percent heritable, so it stands to reason that other racial differences have some biological basis as well.
The influx of non-whites into America erodes our culture. Unintelligent and improvident populations like blacks and Hispanics, through high rates of crime and other forms of social irresponsibility, threaten a peaceful, prosperous society. Not only do these populations act as a drag on the white population, but they tend to corrupt our nation by lowering standards. Indeed, the current mortgage crisis and concomitant stock market collapse are in part due to minority activism to lower home lending standards.
Irresponsible populations have other negative effects on America’s economy. They mean higher taxes for welfare and prisons and a strained social infrastructure. The influx of poorly achieving and crime-prone Hispanics into the schools has caused white flight into an ever-shrinking number of decent school districts. Consequently, housing prices in good neighborhoods soar, and whites go deep into debt in order to provide a future for their children.
Furthermore, non-white groups are a threat to the culture of freedom that white societies have established. Non-whites do not seem to possess the broad-minded tolerance of free expression that is fundamental to Western culture.
Finally, the research of Harvard professor Robert Putnam has demonstrated that diversity destroys trust. In an empirical study of communities, Putnam concluded:
people living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ‘hunker down,’ that is, to pull in like a turtle… [They tend to] withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.
As commentator Ilana Mercer put it, “Greater diversity equals more misery.”
The inherent value of racial autonomy, the preciousness of Western civilization, the distrust and misery bred by racial diversity, and its negative economic impact—together these form a compelling justification for preserving white societies.
Leukophobia
Despite the fact that whites invented the critique of ethnocentrism, contemporary common wisdom has it that whites are the only “racist” race and that all other peoples are noble savages who have been cruelly exploited by us. The pro-white movement dubs the bias against the white race “leukophobia,” or fear and loathing of whites. The counterpart of leukophobia is “chromophilia,” or unwarranted idealization of non-whites.
Leukophobia causes our society not only to exaggerate examples of white egotism and destructiveness, but actually to fabricate white racism hoaxes. Leukophobia is an accepted, mainstream racial hatred, so pervasive that it seems like common sense. Leukophobia has so far been successful in discrediting anyone who has tried to preserve and defend the white race.
Leukophobia creates an inverted world in which the blame for racism falls on the race that has done most—indeed, far too much—to end it. Whites invented the concept of human rights in the name of which the oppression of ethnicities can be criticized. Whites were the first to abolish slavery. American whites have even gone to the extreme of making non-whites a privileged class through affirmative action in order to bring out about racial equality.
White America has discussed several examples of leukophobia and chromophilia. For example, American history textbooks, in the words of Diane Ravitch, display “a barely concealed rage against people of European ancestry.” The textbooks lay heavy emphasis on slavery, racial subjugation, and war crimes perpetrated by whites, while ignoring or whitewashing similar, or worse, practices perpetrated by other peoples. The myth that Americans frequently committed atrocities against Asians during the Vietnam War is another example of anti-white bias in our understanding of history.
Leukophobia even causes the news media to fabricate instances of white racial hatred. The Duke rape and Jena 6 cases are recent examples.
Leukophobia takes its most blatant form among non-whites, large minorities or even majorities of whom fantasize that whites are conspiring to undermine them. The beliefs of Jeremiah Wright are not marginal among blacks. One quarter of blacks think that whites invented AIDS as a means of racial genocide, and 50 percent think that the CIA and FBI have flooded black neighborhoods with guns and drugs so that they will harm one another. Mexican-Americans share similar beliefs about whites.
Even as the shapers of opinion exaggerate and even fabricate instances white racial hatred, examples of non-white racial hatred are ignored. Thus, when whites are even suspected of committing crimes of racial hatred, as in the Duke rape and Jena 6 cases, there is massive press coverage. But proven crimes of racial hatred committed by minorities receive little coverage.
Similarly, the shapers of public opinion suppress awareness of non-white misbehavior, or even more despicably, blame it on whites. Such is the purpose of the myth of racial profiling, which illegitimately pins the blame for high non-white incarceration rates on white police officers and judges.
The Causes of Leukophobia
Leukophobia has many different causes. Among them are minority egotism, which makes whites a scapegoat for minorities’ social dysfunction, and the horrific forms that white ethnocentrism has taken in the past, such as the Hitler regime, American slavery, the Klan, and the neo-Nazis.
Carrying on the dismal tradition of American white supremacism, most pro-whites today believe our current racial dispossession is due to Jewish influence on the West, if not actual Jewish conspiracies against whites. However, these tired lies conceal the real dynamics of white dispossession, which has been inflicted by white Gentiles on themselves. While it is true that Jews have been inclined towards highly liberal—that is, leukophobic—beliefs, nevertheless more than 90 percent of white racial liberals are Gentiles. Moreover, that Jewish leukophobia could thrive in America suggests that it was a mere extension of something in our national character. For these reasons, the pro-white movement repudiates anti-Semitism and will resolutely oppose the obsession with Jews that poisons and discredits our cause.
The primary reason for the ascendancy of leukophobia is diversity snobbery. Various currents in 19th and 20th century thought made tolerance and openness to diversity the virtues that we most esteem. This attitude is particularly prevalent among the wealthy and powerful in America. Leukophobia originated with intellectuals in the early 20th century, spread to college students in the 1960s and to the professional class in the 1970s, and dominates all of the American elite today. While tolerance and openness are great virtues, they turn into vices when taken to destructive extremes.
Diversity snobbery is rooted in the aspiration to show oneself more tolerant and open than others. Diversity snobs slander today’s white majority or the “racist” America of the past so that their own superior virtues can shine more brightly by comparison.
A particularly obnoxious example of the slanders to which diversity snobbery gives rise is the elites’ assertion that America’s immigration reform movement is rooted in “ugliness” and “hatred,” to use the New York Times’ terms or “bitterness,” to use Barack Obama’s. The white working and middle class support the immigration reform movement because they are on the front lines of the demographic transition currently taking place in America. It is they who are suffering from the importation of unintelligent, crime-prone populations into the US. It is they who have to send their children to school with aspiring gangsters. All that the immigration reformers are asking for is enforcement of our current immigration laws. It is monstrous to describe the white majority’s concern for its way of life as “hatred.”
Another manifestation of diversity snobbery is the completely unfounded belief that greater racial diversity leads to greater creativity. In fact, the relatively homogeneous and white racialist culture of early 20th century America produced an explosion of creativity that dwarfs the achievements of the post-Civil Rights era. Think of the extraordinary transformation that took place in America between the end of the 19th century—the age of horse-drawn carts, vaudeville, and typhoid epidemics—and 1950, the age of Pan Am, CBS, and penicillin. All of this was accomplished by us white-bread Americans without any help or other enrichment from Somalis, Guatemalans, or Koreans. It is unlikely that the diverse America of the future will be able to match our ancestors’ record of achievement.
Discrimination and Segregation
The term “civil rights” as it is currently used in America is an Orwellian abomination that actually designates a restriction of rights. The right to racial discrimination, including segregation in housing and schools, is founded on the principle of free association, a right that is normally respected and protected by the law. The pro-white movement supports the extension of this principle to all associations.
In many contexts, it is perfectly legal for Americans to form racially exclusive associations, and there are tens of thousands of them: the National Association of Black Journalists, the National Association of Hispanic Nurses, the National Association of Asian-American Professionals are examples.
If racially exclusive professional groups are legal, there is no reason why racially exclusive neighborhoods should not be. If we can have the National Association of Black Journalists, why is it illegal for a group of white neighbors form an association that declares their neighborhood will be all white? Why is it illegal for white parents to decide to establish a racially exclusive school? There is no foundation in the Constitution for such inconsistencies in laws governing associations, nor can moral arguments justify depriving Americans of a fundamental right.
Consider what would happen if a judge told the National Association of Black Journalists that it could no longer exist because it excludes people on the basis of race. Imagine the outcry! The group’s members would regard this as a tyrannical violation of their rights. Pro-whites think the same of all anti-discrimination laws.
Goals of the Pro-White Movement
The pro-white movement will attempt to preserve the white race in America through lawful activism. The following will be our primary goals and activities:
Improving our movement’s image: The pro-white movement should stand in the public mind for all that is best in the Western tradition, not what is worst. We should make ourselves the representatives of the humane and civilized ideals of the West, not its undeniable history of oppression and atrocities. The public should associate pro-whites with Galileo, John Locke, and Thomas Edison, not with Hitler and the Klan.
Lobbying for accurate portrayals of white history and culture: The ugly stereotypes that attach to the pro-white movement are only an extreme version of the ones that tarnish the image of the white race as a whole. We want the world to see whites not as the only “racist” race but as the torchbearers of compassion and accomplishment.
Lobbying for the dissemination of accurate information on race: Journalists, academics, and other molders of public opinion should be honest about racial differences and diversity’s true effects on America. They should also stop slandering whites in order to bolster the leukophobic myth.
Restoring Americans’ right to free association: People have a natural right to form racially exclusive associations, just as Hispanic nurses and black journalists do. To this end, we support the restoration of Americans’ right to racial discrimination in living arrangements and other aspects of life. If whites want to form racially segregated neighborhoods and schools, it is their right to do so.
Ending mass immigration: America should stop importing non-white peoples who erode the Western values on which this nation was founded.
An end to minority preferences: Preferences for minorities in education and hiring discriminate against the race that founded and built America. Affirmative action also places power in the hands of people who are alien to our white culture and way of life. Minority preferences should be ended.
A Shocking Self-Respect
The pro-white viewpoint may seem shockingly radical. However, we ask you to read our words carefully and consider our ideas seriously. Are these the ravings of madmen, or reasonable conclusions from plausible premises? If our viewpoint is shocking, it is not because we are unreasonable, but because our society is. We ask the white race to show some self-respect, but whites are so used to thinking of themselves as the world’s only racist race that they have forgotten what self-respect is.
Ask yourself whether diversity has really been as enriching as you were told it would be. Hasn’t it rather meant the insecurity and loneliness of alien neighborhoods, shocking insults directed against your culture by minority demagogues, the increasingly crippling expense of living in a decent school district, and a gnawing suspicion that the world has gone wrong?
White men and women, remember that you are the heirs of the race that brought man out of the darkness of despotism and ignorance into the light of freedom and knowledge. See the hosts of your ancestors beseeching you not to let their hard-won civilization perish. Tremble before the prospect of your descendants under alien rule and of a world without blond hair. Join our cause and declare to the world that the white race will not go quietly into the night!
If you want this article to be exposed to a wide audience, take the time to recommend it at digg. Millions of readers traffic the site, and the more recommendations an article gets, the better its chance of being read. If you don't have digg account yet, registration is easy. Just click submit to get started. |
Click here to join the White America mailing list. You'll get an e-mail notice whenever White America publishes new entries.
I wanted to address the issue of the shrinking number of good school districts which are causing whites to pay more than they can afford, to escape diversity. This is an extremely important issue. I grew up in NYC, when freedom of association still existed. Whites chose to live in all white neighborhoods and could live in areas with good schools while paying very reasonable rents or home prices. However, once the cancer of the Civil rights movement reared it’s ugly head, things very quickly deteriorated. Neighborhoods that were still good with reasonable housing costs no longer had good public schools. This was no problem for those families that sent their children to parochial schools. However, families began to move to areas where public schools were still good. I used the word cancer deliberately, because, the process of the anti white AKA civil rights movement operates just as cancer does. It invades healthy organs (neighborhoods) destroys them, then relentlessly moves on the next healthy organ (neighborhood). This continues until the unfortunate person expires unless the disease is put into remission. In the case of escaping diversity the agent of remission is exhorbitant housing prices. However, just as chemotherapy often has terrible side effects, the chemotherapy for escaping diversity has the severe side effect of bankruptcy. However, the cancer (diversity)is not always stopped by exhorbitant housing prices. The diversity mongers are relentless in their quest to introduce low income housing in the most expensive school districts. The school district I live in, as well as other similar districts, nearby, very perceptively, years before diversity sought to “infect” these districts, would not build sewers for the villages involved. Since without sewers, houses could not be close to each other, it had the practical effect of preventing the diversity mongers from forcing these villages to build low income housing.So even ridiculously high housing prices do not always afford protection against the disease of diversity. Whites must regain the right of free association. But as I discussed in my previous post, in order to regain all our rights, first we must gain the right of free speech by using facts and knowledge to neutralize the myths which cause whites to fear speaking out for their own survival. White guilt must be extinguished.
Perhaps we can wish for many things to right the wrongs of the racial agenda, but nothing will work as along as the Global Elitists want a Browning of America. These illegals coming from So. America and Mexico are ‘being let in’ and the border fence is just a mirage to be talked about. Now we have both candidates kissing the fanny of the Hispanic people to get votes and the hexx with the rest of us! Whites are non-existent!
Having just read about the Fall of Rome, hey there! the stage is set for the Fall of America! Same reason….the decline of the major players in the founding of our nation as the Global Elite want a subservient USA, and perhaps a combining of the White and Brown nations to have a tan-colored people. There is ALWAYS a method to their madness, and they have thought this out well! Rule by the Rich, without mercy, without principles and without any sense of what humanity is all about.
Recently I saw a kind of documentary about the size of planet earth as compared to some of the bigger planets. Earth, a tiny dot in the Universe, and the thought comes: why has this little planet of human beings been so cursed with evil-doers who want to destroy it and humanity with nuclear weapon? as it has been for thousands of years, one war after another, somewhere on this precious planet.!! It looks so beautiful from space, and you wonder WHY DOES THIS HAVE TO BE????
Ian:
This looks very promising, particularly your insistence that the Pro-White Movement not be riddled with anti-Semitism.
MJ
I look here and elsewhere and see so many thing white people need to read and understand. Yet, as wonderful as the internet is this type of information is not reaching a mass audience. Some how we need to break though the media barrier. Most people will not read long thoughtful essays no matter how brilliant they may be.
Frankly, I don’t care if it’s Ian Jobling, Lawrence Auster, David Duke (I know, I know), Jared Talyor or some one I have never heard of before who brakes though the wall of silence that they have created. You are not going to get a perfect person for the job. Change is created by feet on the ground.
Max3a,
You’re exactly right about the main problem. An anti-illegal immigration activist that I know told me that he meets a lot of people who would be sympathetic to my views or Taylor’s or Auster’s, but they haven’t heard of us. So the question is how to get the public’s attention.
I remember when I lived in the NYC area, I would walk down the street and see Nation of Islam people handing out flyers. Is that the sort of thing you mean by “feet on the ground”? I’m not mocking it—I’m willing to consider anything. Is that what you want to do?
I always think that pro-whites need to do something public that gets people’s attention. Certainly, nothing illegal, but, if we could just put together a rally attended by 1,000 people, then we might get the kind of media attention necessary for people to find out about us.
I’ll be writing more about this in the future.
Helen,
I hate to say this, but I find your view of our plight unhealthy and deranged. I would challenge you to show me any evidence that there is a group of powerful people who are consciously and intentionally working to destroy the white race. Such conspiracy theories smack of the old Elders of Zion hoax. And I don’t know why you bring nuclear bombs into it.
No, our immigration crisis is rooted in the diversity snobbery I describe in the article above, as well as the demand for cheap labor and minority activism.
I know it’s terribly painful to be conscious of what is happening to the world. But you’ve got to get a grip. Don’t let the anger drive you out of your mind. If you do, you just become a nut who makes all the rest of us look like a bunch of cranks.
Ian: I have now read the whole entry and I must compliment you for a job well done. My only problem is with the term, leukophobia. I much prefer “Europhobia” because it requires no explanation. This is a great first step, but the name of the game for the pro-white movement (PWM) is putting boots on the ground - reasonable and rational boots, I must add. The big question is “how?” Here is what I propose.
We must recognize that several factors will favor the genesis of the PWM. First, is the impending long term economic slide facing our country as it fades to shade, or becomes mostly non-white, and burdened with hordes of illegitimate and illiterate blacks and Hispanics. In times of plenty people are complacent, but when recession and downturn hit, whites will become more self-serving and weary of social giveaways.
Second, the Obama Administration is a silver lining and a God send for the incrementalist approach I have recently begun to advocate. For example, I believe black-on-white crime offers us the low hanging fruit to be plucked, or for the more combative among us, the first pillbox to be taken. Once whites are convinced that they can PUBLICLY speak out against black on white crime, then we can move forward. A PWM could very well be the mechanism to convince whites they have such a right and they must exercise it. Each one of us must be prepared to counter the inevitable slander thrown our way with the following: “If it is OK for Barak and Michelle to sit their butts in a racist afrocentrist church which lauded the likes of Louis Farrakhan and conducted Nurmberg type rallies in which whites were demonized, then why can’t white people form their own groups to protect themselves from black on white crime and to prommote their own interests? Period.” If Barak yearns so much for an open and honest debate, then I say let’s give it to him.
Third, the pro-white movement must enjoy the support of some of the elites, and right now, all we have is Pat Buchanan. Every one of us must read his landmark column, “A Brief For Whitey,” http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25634 but we need to convince the Malkins, the Wests, the Charens, the Thomases, the Wills, and the Gingriches to address this issue as well. I have already written these journalists about black on white crime, and have been ignored, but if more and more of us were to write them concerning our very justifiable fears of black hatred and black crime, then we could put this issue on the radar screen. A Pro-White Movement could very well serve as the rally point around which whites and other fair minded people could coalesce and concentrate their fire on the most dangerous targets affecting their well being and future.
More to follow.
“The Indians murdered all 40 Spainards left by Columbus on San Salvador while sailed back to Spain in late 1492. Until then, Columbus had treated the Indians relatively well.”
Perhaps those Indians were exercising the same impulse toward genetic and cultural self-preservation that you urge upon whites.
Columbus, after all, wasn’t sightseeing. He was on an imperially-sanctioned land grab.
I don’t think that makes him a devil. But let’s call it what it was.
“Treated the Indians relatively well” indeed…
If there is any sense of truth to “A People’s History of the United States” by the leftist activist Howard Zinn, then the famous Undercover Black Man is right on this one. The Spaniards were not very nice, especially to the female Indians, from the very moment they disembarked. After all, a man on board a ship for three months needs some shore duty, and the Indians were not always obliging. But we digress. Amend that portion and move forward. We can be very assertive about our rights, but we should be as accurate as possible.
“… I believe black-on-white crime offers us the low hanging fruit to be plucked…”
You think you got it tough, Mr. Jaws? I’m trying to get intelligent black folks to acknowledge the insane disproportion of black violent crime in general.
Black murderers claim the lives of 20 young black men every day in America. That’s a body count which, in any single year, nearly doubles the total recorded number of black people lynched in the United States since 1882.
But there is profound psychological and political resistance to even discussing this reality.
Mr. Jobling, your work has affected me deeply, and I consider Inverted World to be the foremost representative of the pro-white cause. There is only one point on which I am in doubt. It is whether Western civilisation should command our allegiance because it is an organic whole of which we are a part, or only because it promotes freedom, pluralism, and the rule of law. I am still undecided on this matter.
Joe Hamilton says: the result is: states which are almost all white(Maine, NH, Montana) show Obama leading in recent presidential polls over a genuine war hero John McCain.
If military service is all it takes to be qualified for public office, you may as well write in Jeremiah Wright. John McCain isn’t a war hero, he was a prisoner of war. Since when did being a victim become heroism?
I’d lecture you about not supporting the lesser evil, but I see zero reason why McCain would be any less worse than Obama. Both of them have no interest in a sane immigration policy, both support foreign interventionism that is against American self-interest and both are more than willing to pander to every special interest group that is corrupting the United States government.
Is there anyone here who supports McCain over Obama for any other reason than chromophobia and leukophilia?
I would advise you to vote for the Libertarian Party. I’m no libertarian, but if the Libertarian Party gains a percentage of votes that is larger than the margin that the Democratic Party beats the Republican Party with, maybe the Republicans will consider revising their policies in order to win back the support of the people they have alienated (i.e. non-interventionists, immigration restrictionists, anti-egalitarianists, states rights advocates, etc.).
Mr. Mills, you certainly have your work cut out for you, but I am in the business of helping Mr. Jobling promote a pro-white group, not discussing the problems of black people. There are plenty of black and white folks already doing that.
Having grown up in the lower East Side of Manhattan, I was particularly impacted by black crime with both my parents and one of my sisters robbed by black thugs. It was common in the Vladek housing project. In fact, nationwide the amount of black on white crime is staggering and it being swept under the rug for over 40 years has not exactly helped racial relations. I think whites are well beyond the point of forming lynch mobs and targeting innocent blacks everytime a white woman is raped by a black man, don’t you? More importantly, once we get to the point where whites (and blacks) can openly talk about black crime, I would then like to see its causes dealt with - chief of which is welfare and lack of work - and work ethic - in the inner cities. But one hill at a time. Stay tuned.
Foremost, I want to applaud Joe Hamilton’s 2nd post about good school districts and affordability. The price that whites (and all decent, education-valuing people) pay to avoid crappy schools is almost never addressed. There is a huge premium that has to be paid for the “privilege” of having your kids attend schools that aren’t cesspools. It’s not that a white person necessarily cares if their students are sitting in a classroom with brown and black students, it’s just that majority black and Hispanic public schools are virtually ALL bad.
Secondly, I wanted to address this portion of Max3a’s comment:
Frankly, I don’t care if it’s Ian Jobling, Lawrence Auster, David Duke (I know, I know), Jared Talyor or some one I have never heard of before who brakes though the wall of silence that they have created.
While I understand Max3a’s sentiment, I definitely do care who breaks through the wall of silence because it makes all the difference in the world if this movement has legs. Choosing the messenger is very important:
David Duke: This man is despicable and should never be taken seriously. Duke is cut from the same cloth as Stormfront, VNN, and all the other loons.
Lawrence Auster: Auster is a sharp, cogent and very capable writer. As a longtime reader of his website, I have always been impressed by his insight and analysis. However he is also flawed in my estimation for at least two reasons. 1) He doesn’t accept evolution and seems to constantly mock Darwin. This stance alone almost negates his credentials as a serious messenger. Now I don’t mind that he gets his values and sense of decency from the bible, but if you are going to delve into the origins of human biodiversity, his Christian dogma is a distraction. 2) Auster is cantankerous and I doubt he could sustain a dialogue with a mainstream pundit without throwing a tantrum.
Jared Taylor: Calm under fire and an honorable man. Not sure if has done enough to repudiate the David Duke faction, but I think he could be an effective messenger.
Ian Jobling: You are first-rate, but you don’t (yet) have much name recognition. However, that could work to your favor especially since the PMW is your brainchild and you have a very focused message.
Humphried Boswell,
I’m touched and gratified that my writings have spoken to you.
I don’t know what you mean when you say that the West is an “organic unity.” I will concede that there is much more to Western identity than I discuss. (Concrete suggestions to remedy this incompleteness are welcome.) However, in order to defend our cause, we have to be clear and particular about what it is that makes the West precious to us. Better a definition of the West that is incomplete than one that is hopelessly vague.
Undercover Black Man (“Indeed”) You are a prime example of someone with leukophobia. Your hatred of whites is so obvious you easily justify the murder of 40 Spaniards stranded, 3,000 miles and an ocean away from any assistance. Then you see something not found on this website. What article contains advocacy of killing others? Who on this web site is advocating mass murder? Columbus was looking for a shortcut to the Orient to facilitate trade. He was not going to conquer China with 3 tiny ships. You don’t know anything about Columbus’ first voyage. Jaws ;Of course, the Spanish were brutal towards the inhabitants they encountered AFTER 1492. What reaction did the murderers expect, when and if the Spainards returned? You are thoroughly indoctrinated in the belief that whites are much more evil than other races. But the Aztecs were so evil and blood thirsty that it took only 600 conquistadors to destroy their empire. Why? Because the neighboring non-Aztec tribes were tired of having their families murdered in the most gruesome manner, in numbers even the Nazis never equaled. They gladly provided crucial assistance to Hernan Cortes,because they had just grown a little tired of having their hearts cut out of their chests while awake. You won’t find that fact in Howards Zinn’s book of disinformation. But the descendants of the Aztecs don’t feel an ounce of guilt about killing 10,000 “sacrifices” per day during their “religious festivals”. Mexicans continue to name their children after the blood thirsty Aztec emperor Chautamoc. This certainly contradicts the image of “Native Americans” as peace loving people who lived in total harmony with their surroundings until the “brutal” white man arrived.
BB: McCain was is not a war hero because of his military service only. Despite, being tortured frequently, he refused the opportunity to be released from captivity in favor of another prisoner who had been in captivity longing. Would you have done that? I also believe flying a jet regulary on bombing missions against targets which were protected by the most effective anti-aircraft defense (Thanks to the Soviet Union)from a ship in the ocean makes McCain a war hero.
I don’t like the term leukophobia or europhobia for that matter - The “phobia” part is what irks me because I don’t associate the problem with some sort of instinctual fear of anything white. It just strikes me as the wrong word. The crux of the problem is a revisionist interpretation of history where whites are cast as the unique perpetrators of wrongdoing. I really don’t have a better term to call it, but maybe a clever acronym will fit the bill: (?)
Post-Modern Anti-Caucasian Revisionism (PMACR) Baseless Anti-White Revisionism (BAWR)
Joe Hamilton wrote of me: “Your hatred of whites is so obvious you easily justify the murder of 40 Spaniards stranded, 3,000 miles and an ocean away from any assistance.”
Ummm… let’s see what Christopher Columbus himself wrote about these “Indians” before he returned to Spain:
“They ought to make good and skilled servants, for they repeat very quickly whatever we say to them. I think they can very easily be made Christians, for they seem to have no religion.”
“They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance.”
“I could conquer the whole of them with 50 men, and govern them as I pleased.”
(From “The Log of Christopher Columbus’ First Voyage to America in the Year 1492.”)
I resent the suggestion that I suffer from “leukophobia.” (Though I did battle, and beat, Hodgkin’s Disease.)
Joe:
I can assure you that Concerned is not indoctrinated with anti-white PC. To the core I am a pro-white activist. What I know about the initial encounter between Columbus and the Indians comes from Zinn’s book which I referred to earlier. But just because the Spaniards were mean and perhaps pushy with the the Indian maidens in no way exonerates the Indians for the atrocities that they themselves inflicted on the white encroachers or on their fellow indigenous folk (e.g., the Aztecs). It was not exactly a marriage made in heaven.
Let us stay focused and try to be as factually accurate as possible. We should be offering suggestions to amend Ian’s work where appropriate and not get into urinating contests with visitors who probably have no interest in our success.
Too many other pro-white sites are tainted and marred by intramural squabbles. Let that not happen here. Too much is at stake.
Ian please consider amending the encounter between Columbus and the Indians.
Concerned
Excellent literature, Mr. Ian Jobling! I agree with your principles on racial preservation.
We, under the currently suppressive social climate (and unaware Whites), need to start slowly and subtlely. We just need to talk to our families and friends. We need to talk about racial abuses and our demographic fate. We need to persuade our personal buddies to organize. When we get as few as 20 Whitepeople to agree on our race’s survival, they (preferably in an area no bigger than a small town, for each group. It would be difficult for somebody to travel from Buffalo to Manhattan on a regular basis.) can start clubs/groups. They will talk about our race’s prospects, especially in a respective area. It will be local, statewide, and national. The group will work on waking up Whites, and mobilize for our interests. It will even encourage migrations, for group long-term survival.
One may ask “Well, what if somebody spies, and decides to fire these pro-White Whites?” Well, lawsuits may be sought, and even if they are unsuccessful, each group will seek long-term personal survival. If a man can’t find proper work, he will be fed and given the means for survival. The group will maintain access to a food and water supply, and shelter for crisises (including, but not limited to natural disasters). The groups may even bear arms, if the area becomes excessively violent.
As these groups organize, they form communication networks, akin to the Committees of Correspondence, but for peacetime model. The groups will organize into respective chapters and divisions. For example, all groups in Syracuse, NY will form an organization, which will be in the divison of New York groups (including Buffalo, Elicotville, Albany, etc.) of all city organizations. And then New York will be under the American National Organization. Toastmasters International serves as one possible example/model.
The groups will not advocate “hatred” for other races, and/or their superiority. We will not get much done by saying Blacks and Hispanics are less intelligent. Instead, we will reflect on our heritage (i.e. Charles Martel, the Enlightenment, the Scientific Revolution, etc.) and promote racial survival. We will almost be racial “liberals,” to the extent we will love the other races and support their surivival, as well. And then we can get empathetic fellow Whites to see. We will say, “We support the racial preservation of everybody. Now, what about us, self-hating Whites?” We will almost (but not quite) be ‘head over heals’ apologists for non-Whites, but at the same time show the need for preservation and right to protection from the Brown and Black ‘Klans!’ We must show the need to protect ourselves from the other races, and present them as racist, as well.
We need to discredit attacks on us, by opposing racial injustices against non-Whites and violence. But we also need to show that all races are naturally and inherently racist.
Regarding migration, fellow European Americans, you are well advised to leave the American Southwest and Southern Florida, as soon as possible. Whites in Florida, move north of Orlando, ASAP. And avoid Sanford, Palatka, and even Gainesville (in the long-term for the third). Ocala is ok in the short-term. But if you want to stay in Florida, move to the strip from Holly Hill to St. Johns County, until Florida is less than 65-70% White (outside of Miami and surrounding areas), at the latest. Thereafter, you may need to leave the state immediately. Stay away from the Floridian Panhandle, it will just be distacting and a potential trap.
You have provided a great foundation for waking up fellow Whites, Mr. Ian Jobling. You make the ideal spokesman for our race, as we need to avoid anti-Semitism and counter-productive “hate-speech.” Now, let’s spread the word from ourselves and close ones, to the nation. (The internet can and should be used, though not exclusively, by any measure.)
An expat who lives in Europe most of the year for various reasons, I agree with most of what you say, but cannot relate to calling myself “white”: it is too abstract.
This is also consistent with the poaster who suggested the term “Europhobia,”
I regard myself as EUROPEAN (or Euro-American, that is to say, as the product of a CIVILIZATION created over thousands of years.
The discourse over here is hanging rapidly, and Germany (despite the official guilt culture) is at east 5 years ahead of the US when it comes to straight talk about immigration, assimilation, etc.
Being 1/2 Jewish, I am not attracted to the white seperatist movement generally - and any account of European civilization that leaves out the extraordinary contributons of Jews is just fiction.
Leaving out the Salk vaccine, the theory of relativity, the symphonies of Mahler, and the philosophy of Wittgenstein is no different from leaving out (or slandering) Lincoln and Jefferson in PC versions of US history. (It also means acknowledging the achievements of people you might not agree with: Noam Comsky is a key 20th century linguist, Adorno one if its greatest philosphers and writers, Sontag an often brilliant art critic.)
But I am also a cosmopolitan, that is to say, a strong, healthy society in control of its own borders and destiny has nothing to fear from interacting with other societies, and everything to gain.
We also need to peel away much gibberish re emigration: it is really about ordinary and largely decent people from truly horrible places who want to live like us, and is hence rational, not an organized invasion (although the oucome could be the same if we allow it to continue).
With these proviso, the sickest and most insane thing in world history is for the most advanced civilization in history - the European one - to destroy itself, and the process must be reversed.
The task is to become the new hegemonic discourse in the next decade, and that means rigorously avoiding all defamatory and hate rhetoric without succumbing to PC jargon.
And getting rid of anything resembling the truly brain dead and obsolete (a century ago) free market ideology: we live in a world of mega corporations, and they need to be controlled.
Europe, by the way, is full of people who want to end immigration but who are equally committed to a strong social market economy with robust social programs - there is no contradiction here (just the issue of immigrant abuse).
Don’t just rehearse your slogans, educate yourselves!!!!!
Ian Jobbling,
I noticed the tendency of people to need a “bad guy” psychologically in various movements. Christians use the devil, Communists use rich people, Black people use the police, Democrats use Republicans, WNs use the Jews, Jews use the nazis. People like the drama of feeling that they are persecuted. I think an unfortunately reality is that this drama queen psychology may need to be appealed to if a mass movement is to be built. Myself, I think it is immature to use a scapegoat, but I am a realist, and I know that some people need a crutch
Likewise, do you think the movements of racialism that rejects antisemitism would benefit from the selection of a new villain? I know you are intelligent enough to understand that the problems we face come from a disorganized collection of lobbyists who are motivated for variant reasons, but some more simpleminded people need a simple answer to the question “why,” what would you give them?
If a scapegoat is selected, what would be the best? Businessmen, religious leaders, liberals, minority rights activists, etc?
Not to make too much of it, but names, labels, definitions, and descriptions are very important to real people on the ground. It is always an irritant when members of one group decide that they have the authority to name the Other. And so it is with the label Gentile, as you did here:
“However, these tired lies conceal the real dynamics of white dispossession, which has been inflicted by white Gentiles on themselves.”
I don’t want to be inflicted with the name Gentile (white or otherwise), so I fall outside your dualism of Jew and Gentile. It might sound fine to your ears, just as it did to the runaway Mormon group recently attacked in Texas. They called everyone else Gentile, too! But why not take it easy on this point, and let everyone name themselves?
Don,
I’m certainly not stopping anyone from naming himself. Anyway, since I believe Gentile is the Jewish designation for a non-Jew, this word could be called Judeocentric. A more objective term would be “non-Jew,” so this is the term I will use from now on.
Gentile is also the Mormon designation for a non-Mormon. I do not like referring to people in the negative. Hence, I prefer the term gentile to non-Jew.
Good stuff, but you’re shoveling back the tide.
Western Civilization and the white race have had a good run, but our day is coming to a close. Western Civilization is consumed by self-hatred, and is determined to extinguish itself to expiate the guilt of the world wars. Cultural transformation is extremely unlikely given that the main inculcators of culture - the schools and the mass media - are firmly controlled by the advocates of Western suicide. Some kind of technological singularity might yet save our bacon, but I wouldn’t count on it.
The world will go on without us, though. East Asians in particular are confident, conscientious, and talented; a world dominated by China is not such a bleak prospect. Further, the Jewish people seem to have evolved extraordinary creativity and intelligence in just a few thousand years; if h. sapiens can soldier on for a few more milennia, someone new will come along to replace us eventually.
Lawful Neutral,
The truth is that you are speculating. Just because there is a trend does not mean that the trend will continue in the same direction.
Who would have believed years ago that I would have a box on my desk that allows me to write something that almost every home in the world could read. Would George Washington have believed that a black man could be nominated for president?
Some kind of technological singularity might yet save our bacon.. How about an economic singularity, because it is coming.
When the bread and circus begins to desert us…
Of course I am speculating. But I do know that if we follow your pessisim our day will come to a close.
Jimmy Stubble,
You’re right, I am speculating. If I could say with certainty what the future will bring, I’d be a very rich man. History is far from over, and we might see a renaissance of Western Civilization and the white race.
Like you say, a severe economic downturn might make the West swerve from its suicidal path. I doubt it, though. How many men abandon their religion in hard times? Not many, I’d say. “Anti-racism” or leukophobia, call it what you will, is a religion to most Westerners: it is the highest source of virtue and truth, and a cause we must further every day. Those who oppose it are heretics and enemies of the entire community; they must be destroyed, silenced, or converted.
I disagree with you, Lawful Neutral. Anti-racism has flourished ONLY in times of affluence and complacency. Take away that affluence and the security and comfort it provides, and all bets are off -especially if white nationalist allies and their traditionalist allies can demonstrate how the TREMENDOUS costs imposed by blacks and mestizos have contributed to the downturn. While I agree with you that East Asians may very well inherit the Earth, I would not count the white race out yet. There is indeed much work to be done, but the PC / Multicultural complex is build on the flimsiest of foundations and like the Soviet Union, may very well collapse without much advanced warning.
I’m of Kevin Macdonald school of thought, but I’ll certainly support ANY pro-white group that manages to arise, even if it doesn’t acknowledge the Jewish problem. And I have plenty of friends that will join too.
I think it’s a mistake to require ideological purity, or for that matter, total honesty about one’s beliefs. Any way we can get this message out and get people organized is good. If you want to try and create a jew-friendly pro-white group, go for it.
I will tell you a story. A certain very radical pro-white group which for all practical matters, perished with the death of it’s founder, served as a “contact service” for people with pro-white views. It certainly had more ambitious goals, but it’s function as a contact service was in my view the best thing it did. All of my friends today were members of this group, and this social network has lasted 6 years.
White people are very lonely nowadays. If you can create a safe and classy environment for people to socialize face to face and form lasting friendships, you are on your way. I suggest outings to Vermont to go apple picking in the, chartered fishing trips on the ocean - stuff like that. And when you get a core group in a certain area, I would recommend joining a local archery club and forming your own team.
Also, the queers use a term “Are you batting for the team” which is code for “are you queer?” We should come up with a similar coded question for asking people if they are pro-white.
Mr. Jobling:
You may recognize me as a regular contributor at View From the Right. I’m the one who is advocating a campaign of “conservative apologetics” against the premises of the leftist thinking that currently rules. I just discovered your manifesto; the creation of such identifies you as a serious thinker.
I would like to know your position on Christianity. Let me explain why this is an important question.
The proper business of serious conservatives is the restoration of a properly ordered American society. (“Order” refers to the laws, rules and customs that make America what she is.) America’s fundamental problem is that her society is seriously disordered under the domination of liberalism, the worldview of the left.
Every society has an order, and that order always proceeds from an official or unofficial state religion, because a religion is primarily a comprehensive philosophical system that describes the nature of reality, answers the big questions, and provides individuals and groups with a code of conduct. Until recently, America’s unofficial state religion was a watered-down version of Christianity. But nowadays, it is the worldview of the left that is accepted by most Americans and that is used by most of our leaders as the basis of their decisions. Liberalism rules.
In the restored America that you envision, what religion (philosophical system, if you will) would rule? My position is that Christianity has always (well, for the last 2000 years or so) been vital to Western Civilization, and therefore any serious conservatism must aim to restore it to a position of at least cultural (if not legal) authority. Some system must rule, so if it isn’t Christianity, what will it be?
Alan Roebuck
Mr. Roebuck,
The religious nature of a restored America is an open question for me. Though I have deep respect for the profundity of Christian thought and recognize that Christianity was crucial to the formation of Western culture, I am not a Christian. My restored America would not, therefore, necessarily be Christian. That said, if an enlightened Christian movement emerged that challenged the dominant liberalism on race, I would gladly support it.
Let me make clear what I mean by “enlightened.” An enlightened Christianity would take a tolerant attitude towards non-militant and assimilated non-Christians and would not impose a Christian agenda on the natural sciences. The moment a Christian movement began to require Americans to publicly profess Christianity or censure scientific work that was deemed incompatible with a Christian agenda, I would oppose it, or support it unenthusiastically as the lesser evil, no matter how much I approved of the movement’s other principles.
Lawrence Auster’s and your own anti-Darwinism are deeply distasteful to me, as I’ve said in the past—do a search on Auster for my other articles on this subject. But, as long as people like you allow people like me to live and write unmolested, I’ll be happy to collaborate with you in overthrowing liberalism.
I’ll add that I also oppose the unbalanced hostility towards Christianity that prevails among many secularists and Darwinists today, with Richard Dawkins as the foremost example: I love Dawkins when he writes about biology, but I hate him when he writes about politics.
Ian:
I am glad to hear again your thoughts on the topic of “enlightened” Christianity. I became a southern Baptist almost 30 years ago and converted to Catholicism back in 2002. I currently attend one of the most orthodox Catholic churches in a pretty conservative diocese. Prior to that my wife and I attended very conservative Baptist churches. We taught Sunday school and were involved in many activities. I have never met anyone who would impose a Christian view on the natural sciences -with the exception of evolution, which the Christian masses would prefer be taught as a theory. I think you have very little to fear from 21st century Christians. As always, we must return to the task at hand - how to build a pro-white society which allows us to freely express our pride for - and love of - our race and to exist as a unique and distinct people.
By the way, Rob’s comments from Aug 15th, were spot on. He has some good ideas and I am glad to hear him acknowledge that “white people are lonely” - we are. I know I feel abandoned by the elites of my country who seem to think whites have no legitimate interests as a group, or even the grounds to express such an interest. That must stop and it is about time we put an end to it.
Mr. Jobling:
Thanks for your respectful response to my comment. Rather than argue evolution, I’d like to try to expand our understanding of the situation and possibly find additional common ground between our positions by continuing to examine the type of restored American society for which we are fighting. Here are two excerpts from an essay I’m working on titled “The [Proposed] Manifesto of the American Traditionalist Society:” (I apologize for an 800-word comment, but this is necessary to make my points clearly.)
Article VII: Christianity must again become what it was for most of our history: the publicly-acknowledged governing philosophical system of American society. And therefore liberalism must no longer rule. This does not mean that all Americans must be Christians, nor that all Christians must be of one particular denomination. It means exactly and only what it says: Every nation must have a philosophical system that is acknowledged publicly to be authoritative for the ordering of that nation. And since Christianity is both the truest worldview and the historic center of American and Western society, it must form the philosophical basis for the ordering of American society. Individual Americans will be free to disbelieve in Christianity, but they will not be free to try to make America itself either secular or of another religion. Of course, the unique peoples, history and customs of America also play a role on forming her society, so Christianity will not be the totality of America’s ordering principles. It will only be the authoritative philosophical system.
The Christianity that undergirds the social order is more accurately called the general Christian worldview, that is, Christian views of the basic natures of God, the world, man and society, along with biblical morality. Christian doctrines concerning the salvation of individuals are not relevant for the ordering of society, except that these doctrines must not be subjected to inordinate public disrespect, since conspicuous public disrespect for the foundations of a society always damages that society.
Despite its emphasis on Christianity, the American Traditionalist Society is not involved in bringing individuals to a saving faith in Jesus Christ. Its business is the proper ordering of American society, and in that goal, people of different beliefs can agree.
When arguing for traditionalist conservatism, we generally will not lead with Christianity. We will be arguing for a properly ordered society rather than a view of God, and therefore non-Christians of common sense and good will can agree with us. But we must be prepared to refute the hard-core atheists who attempt to use atheism to invalidate traditionalist conservatism, and therefore we must be able to present arguments for theism and Christianity.
Article VIII: Science is not the highest form of knowledge. The belief that it is, commonly called “scientism,” is one of the defining characteristics of liberalism, because liberalism posits that God cannot be known, in which case man is the supreme being. And since science is the most well-developed, pragmatically successful and self-correcting form of human knowledge, science, to the liberal, must trump every other form of knowledge.
But scientism is radically destructive of society, because it makes impossible any knowledge (as opposed to opinion or prejudice) about what matters most to man, such as religion, morality, the meaning of life, beauty, honor, and so on, none of which can be known scientifically. And this official agnosticism about the most important matters leads naturally to cynicism, pessimism and nihilism, not to mention charlatanism and tyranny. Furthermore, scientism is radically false even on its own terms: Since scientism itself cannot be verified scientifically, it must, according to its own terms, be regarded as nothing more than opinion. Furthermore, science obviously is premised, and therefore dependent, on many forms of non-scientific knowledge: logic and mathematics, ethics, the reliability of sense perception, a common sense understanding of reality, and so on. Any of these forms of knowledge is more fundamental, and therefore “higher,” than science.
We also note that institutionalized science, although it generally does not openly endorse scientism, is almost uniformly hostile to the traditionalist conservative ideas that are necessary for a properly-ordered society. (Granted that a few individual scientific objectors do exist.) Contemporary science’s premises are atheistic or at best agnostic and therefore the conclusions of science, when they have social or political ramifications, usually support the policies of liberalism, since liberalism is also premised on atheism (actual or de facto). Furthermore, scientists are members of America’s intellectual elite, and this intellectual elite not only is almost uniformly leftist, but also takes vigorous and decisive action to defend leftism.
Science need not be hostile to a properly ordered American society, provided that it does not falsely see itself as the pinnacle of knowledge or the ally of political leftism. But we must acknowledge, with regret, that science as it is currently understood functions as one of liberalism’s main weapons, and therefore defending against this weapon is one of traditionalist conservatism’s greatest needs.
I find the sentiment on this site, that the impending genocide of whites can be stopped by talking about it, somewhat disturbing. That might have worked 30 years ago, but it will not today. It is too little, too late.
What you have to understand is the inertia of the situation. The governments involved are so large, and the numbers of people as well, that shifting direction is a very very slow thing. And the demographic trajectories do not give us that kind of time. Regardless, you do not seem to advocate policies of long term survival, such as restriction on inter-racial breeding (I could care less about inter-racial marriage so long as both parties are sterile). In my home state, practically every new African male who moves into town is seen with a short, bruised, pregnant white female trailing silently along behind.
The sun has gone down in the west, behind the hills into shadow. How did it come to this? —Theoden
Mr. Exegesis, I must criticize you for your hopelessness. I have a fair amount of experience in organizing my personal, small-scale crusades, and I have learned that the only thing holding us back is ourselves. For example, my wife and I brought The Rush Limbaugh Show through our lobbying efforts to the Armed Forces Network in late 1993. We had to fight the Armed Forces Radio and TV Network bureaucracy, but we prevailed. Before I retired from the Army in 1995, I launched a European-American Appreciation Week at the Norfolk Naval Base, which was very well received and attended by a fair amount of blacks. Prior to the event, I solicited support from the base authorities, who readily gave it and I recruited helpers from Greek, Polish, Italian, and Scottish groups, who set up booths and displays. I have also recently launched an effort to battle illegal immigration in Stafford County, VA.
While I may not be the world’s most eloquent writer or possess the greatest leadership skills, I do have determination and guts - commodities in short supply among our fellow whites. But I am 100% certain that if we organize and support each other, there is nothing that can stop us. When traditionalists band together, they can move anything, because the only weapon the Left has in its arsenal is imaginary - and that is the race card. But fortunately by their nominating the black supremacist, Barak Obama, they have forfeited any credibility on this issue. Yet they will continue to endeavor to convinced white people that if they dare even to think of organizing on their own behalf, then they must be Nazis.
I am a half-Jew, white American and I deplore what the Nazis not only did to Jews, but to Slavs, and for launching a white civil war which not only emasculated Europe, but the whole white race as well. However, like every other group, we have the God-given right guaranteed under the Constitution to organize and express our grievances. Like many of you, I know I can do more - and I want to do more on behalf of our people and our culture. And I plan to. But please don’t give up the ship. We have not yet begun to fight.
ALLCON,
That was some good John Paul Jones for those of you naval historians who said as the British were boarding his ship and the Brit captain demanded his surrender, “I have not yet begun to fight!” He won that battle against extreme odds. I would like to call your attention to another two instances in which Western Civilization survived while outnumbered: the Battle of Tours where Charles “The Hammer” Martel stopped the invading Muslims in southwest France and the Siege of Vienna where Jan Sobieski crushed the invading Ottomans (still Muslim).
The undeniable advantage that these two instances of Western Civilization saving itself from destruction is that our ancestors were European. Germans fought alongside Poles and Franks for the greater good of Europe.
I also have to disagree with Undercover Black Man about why Columbus came to America: he was looking for a way to avoid dealing with the Middlemen in the Spice Trade (Muslims again). What happened after he got there was as you say, but you said, “he was on an imperially sanctioned land grab.” I would also like to call everyones attention that the Monks sent to perform their apostolic duties of conversion reprimanded the Spaniards for their mistreatment of the natives and wrote to Rome for help on the matter.
Still, the larger matter is that it can be done. We CAN save Western Civilization. Much like Concerned says, it takes the will to survive. Standing idly by while better men do the job is not how I will go.
“Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here obedient to their laws we lie”
I did not mean to indicate we should give up; I merely think more potent tactics are necessary. I don’t think success is possible without catastrophe. I believe a medium scale nuclear war, for instance, would actually substantially increase white survival chances. Such nonsense as open borders, global welfare and aid, and a culture of self-hate would be unaffordable luxuries.
I agree with all of the goals except the one on restoring the right to free association. It seems to me that whites ought to be able to maintain their identity and cohesiveness without having to change the rules that all other races and ethnic groups have to play by in this country. This does not mean that I am opposed to the right to free association in principle. I just think it is a mistake to let ourselves and others think that white identity is so fragile that we can’t preserve it without changing the laws on free association.
There are other goals I would add to the list. One is to promote the recognition of white identity as a legitimate motivating factor for many of the other goals (i.e. ending immigration). Perhaps this belongs with the first goal of “preserving our movement’s self image.” Another would be to promote and strengthen white identity by various means, including the creation of educational material (for various age groups) and establishing social networks and cultural centers.
Help in Charlotte NC. this city is trying to force me to send my 6th grade son to an nearly all Black School, we can not at this time afford to move. So I am keeping him home on home school. I have been told a Black education is better than none. Please advise, I fear for my Son’s life in this situation. I have never seen so many problems, two other children of mine were robbed at gunpoint (guns in the flesh of the neck and face) last christmas, by 3 black people, and again attempted to be robbed by two black people a few months ago. I need a way to make this city bus my child to a school with at least 50% white. we are not alone.
Please post.
It sounds like an awful situation, AL. I sincerely sympathize with you, but cannot offer any advice. What about the rest of you?
Ian-as the proposed head of a pro-white movement, I daresay you owe AL more than mere sympathy for her plight. The protection and proper tutelage of our young is every white persons responsibility, and until we recognize this, we lack the essential awareness necessary for our own survival. May I suggest a resurrection of the “segregation academies” of the the old(and sorely missed) White Citizen’s Council? Bargain priced, nonelte schools for whites to protect our young from the depredations of minorities and liberalism. These schools were run by people sympathetic to the preservation of the white race, and they intentionally made these schools affordable and and nonexclusive. A white child whose parents could not afford tuition were given scholarships, and his of her parents were expected to contribute “sweat equity” to the school
The resurrection of segregation academies is an intriguing idea, but do anti-discrimination laws apply to private schools?
This is the most amazing fascist-racist crap I’ve ever come across. But I don’t frequent the neo-Nazi web sites. This puts great eye liner and lipstick, blush, eye shadow, etc., but the pig showing through is the same pig that bloomed in Germany in the 1930s. It is the same pig that called itself the KKK, and the White Citizens Council. And it is just as disgusting, anti-human, anti-Christ and anti-God now as it ever has been.
“This puts great eye liner and lipstick, blush, eye shadow, etc., but the pig showing through is the same pig that bloomed in Germany in the 1930s”
In what way is the philosophy espoused in this piece the identical to anything in 1930s Germany? Please be specific.
“And it is just as disgusting, anti-human, anti-Christ and anti-God now as it ever has been.
In what way are humanity, Christ and God opposed to the principles this article contained?
OUTSTANDING! I have just left an e-mail on the McCain site,and after being filled with much disappointment,and,yes,anger,I had to find a site that offered a respite from this circus of fools.If John McCain,and “Barry”Obama,are the best this country can do,we’re in trouble.Especially if you’re white.I’m sitting here listening to John McCain get booood’by his own people.He’s saying how he wants to be president,but if Barack gets elected,he’s(Barack)a really nice guy,and we shouldn’t be afraid of him.Well,John,I AM AFRAID.If Obama wins,there’s gonna be Hell to pay,and if he loses,there’s gonna be Hell to pay.The Blacks in Kansas City have already said there would be fire in the streets.If people think the Bush White House isn’t prepared,they better think again.National Guard troops are already on standby for any “Civil unrest”,and George W. can use his emergency “directives” at the drop of a hat.(and yes,there really are detention centers)Damn right I’m afraid.If we’re going to survive as a race,we better get real tough,real quick.My great great Grandfather was a surgeon for William Clarke Quatrill the famous Missouri Freedom fighter during the War against the yankee invaders.He was made to dig his own grave by colored yankee troops,working for the white yankee traitors.When he had finished digging he asked to see his 2 children.They stood across the grave opposite him,as he was shot in the back of the head,by Abe Lincolns’pride and joy…the Colored troops.I mentioned this story because,that is exactly what Obama has in store for all the White traitors that will vote for him.He’ll get there votes,and then…well you get the picture. JB
It’s OK for blacks to belong to black only groups. Whites however can’t do the same, try starting a nonprofit white only support group of any kind. All hell will come down on you. If a white person wants to join a pro white group it’s got to be in secret. I’m really sick and tired of the double standard and all of the advantages given to anyone except the average white male.
Thank you ian. thank you saying it. Thank you for not being afraid to point out the fact that there are lots of groups for non- whites e.g. naacp, idf, adl, and lots more, but its seems to be at least taboo and sometimes illegal for us to form white groups. Also thank you for making all your wonderfull points in an educated and fair manner. Its is about time us white people stop letting the media make us feel shame for our great race. We need to be Proud.
P.S. Throw your tvs in the garbage, they are the white mans biggest threat.
Vladmir Putin is going to have a field day with Barry Hussein.Putin didn’t spend most of his life in the KGB,not learning anything about the the black race in America.The average black remains to be a lazy,get something for nothing race,continuing it’s need to be “cared for” by whites.It dumbfounds me as to why I have to provide documentation of my citizenship,to get a 9.oo an hour job,while,Barry Hussein can get the worlds’ most prestigious job,proving nothing.”Predjudicial”,is a mild term for my present feelings about the black race,it’s,menopausal white women,traitor supporters,it’s gay male butterfly chasers,and it’s lost in the sixties Black Panther thugs.I hope I live to see Putin chew up Barry and spit him out,in William Ayers front yard.God Bless Der Fuerer! John W. Benson
Additional reasons to have white in movement name.
http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/articles/articles/thebeginningofwhiteamerica/
” Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood…Make big plans, aim high in hope and work. Daniel H. Burnham US architect & city planner (1846 - 1912)
”
We want to keep the white lands. We don’t want to fade out of history. We want to say the truth that we created this civilization and its ours.
We also don’t want to be silenced about the truth about genes, crime, diversity, 3rd world chaos, the loss of our schools and institutions, and the lies that permeate all of our society about race. PC is an ideology of genocide of whites. We want to say that and object to it. We have to have white in our movements name to do that. If we don’t, we will be taken over by the PC whites who want to be cheer leaders for our genocide and tell lies about why what is happening is happening.
Gentlemen (and Ladies)
thank you for a refreshing exchange of ideas and a realistic viewpoint of life in the USA in 2009. there’s a lot of work to do, we have a long way to go… we’ll get there.
On the decision making racial segregation in private schools illegal: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=427&page=160 (…) It is worth noting at the outset some of the questions that these cases do not present. They do not present any question of the right of a private social organization to limit its membership on racial or any other grounds. 5 They do not present any question of the right of a private school to limit its student body to boys, to girls, or to adherents of a particular religious faith, since 42 U.S.C. 1981 is in no way addressed to such categories of selectivity. They do not even present the application of 1981 to private sectarian schools that practice racial exclusion on religious grounds. 6 Rather, these cases [427 U.S. 160, 168] present only two basic questions: 7 whether 1981 prohibits private, commercially operated, nonsectarian schools from denying admission to prospective students because they are Negroes, and, if so, whether that federal law is constitutional as so applied. (…)
There do seem to be some loopholes here that would allow for private school segregation. For example, the school could be an adjunct designed for the children of members of a private, segregated social organization or church. In addition the organization could be religiously “Kinist.” Re Kinism:
http://leeinthemountains.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/kinism-pss/
http://www.kinism.net/index.php/weblog/beliefs/
You can put up web sites with hundreds of pages of arguments about why the world should be white and why the other “aces” should be wipped out (yes, that’s what you want, a world populated only by light skinned people and have the others destroyed, it’s just that it takes a lot more words to say the same thing only with elegant words so you don’t sound like a drunk hysterical klansmen).
I’ll be brief…
Animals present variations according to the environment they live in, a rabbit can have its fur completely darkened to match the woods in the summer and turn completely white to match the snow in the winter. Same with humans, the variations in color and other features are the product of constant adaptation and variation. Take a hundred African tribes put them in the Alps and wait 25 thounsand years and they will all become white.
Talking in your own terms you whites still wouldn’t be a the top, Asians are smarter. According to James D. Watson (Amrican… and white…) studies have found links between race and intelligence and Asians are the leaders. You can see “diversity” at work in the form of many of the sciences and sngineering professors at many of the universities in the United States.
So far I haven’t learned of any Bible passage saying Christ segregated any people by its skin color.
God hasn’t destroyed the rest of the cultures. On the other hand, it was a group of whites responsible for the Holocaust… however, in Africa many tribes treat their own in despicable ways, but you white-pride-sickos put yourself down to the same level as them, since both of you are moved by irrational hatred.
There’s no Bible passage saying that God supports the destruction of the cultures of people different than whites. The Bible doesn’t even mention or distinguishes any race in any part.
A black invented peanut butter.
A Mexican invented TV color.
America was populated by non-white people first.
To end my entry:
I’ve come accross many white pride web sites, all of them made by Americans. I’m pretty sure you’re the only part of the global population, far worse, the caucasian population that still thinks the world should be white. You ought to relax and act more Canadian or British.
I think that this site is a great idea.
To be a success, this concept must - as it appears you are doing - stay away from blaming or attacking other races or Jews etc. It should be a “take the intelligent high road” sort of movement. It should fight for white rights. It should not spend its time slandering other races.
It will take along time to turn the perception of a white only group around. But I agree it needs to be done. There is nothing wrong with being proud of being white and celebrating white culture and history. Just keep it clean and stay far away from talking to much about other races. Just keep talking about the white race - and spend your time attacking - through social political action - anything or anyone who slanders the white race. Picture being a white version of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. Do what they do - but for white people. This kind of movement will take decades to bring it about.
Nice try Dave the tired old invention BS.
“A black invented peanut butter.”
Wrong. First of all I wouldn’t call peanut butter an invention it’s more of a recipe, and secondly the Aztecs mashed peanuts into paste hundreds of years ago and modern peanut butter can be traced to a man named Edson from Quebec and J.H. Kellogg had a substance he called “nut-butter” in 1897.
“A Mexican invented TV color.”
Maybe you mean a Mexican invented color tv, again wrong. Polish inventor Jan Szczepanik patented a color television system in 1897, and the first color broadcast was done by a Scottish man.
“America was populated by non-white people first.”
I don’t see how since the America was founded by white people and named after a white Italian.
Also, there are white people all over the world who have the same feelings but this site is dealing with the US.
I love how on all types of forums theres always a person of color trying to defend their race by making outrageous claims of false history.
Ive heard everything from Africa being a technological marvel to blacks inventing electricity.
The whole peanut butter thing is so funny! We invented the pasteurization process and most likeley the canning process (making preserves)
So whats a peanut butter and jelly sandwich without jelly and a cold glass of safe to drink milk?
lol
Anywho Ill match up your peanut butter (Ill give that to you) with….lets say…A computer?
How about the automobile?
Nuclear Bomb?
Cell phone?
Cameras?
You going to match my bet or fold?
I see you dont have many chips.
Too bad.
wow what can i say? we afrikaans white people made south africa the only country in black africa that look like something from europe. when we tried to survive as a nation it was called apartheid and the whole world including most white nations hated us and helped tha blacks to rule. now since we lost goverment all the white farmers are murdered and white people are in danger everywhere. we dont even get any attention from any country, white or not, to help us survive the black violence on us?????????? what a joke to say whites are united against genocite !!!!
The fact that Obama is leading in the polls for president,IMHO is the result of decades of leukophobia. By any objective standard, Obama is absolutely unqualified to serve as President. I had the unpleasant experience of seeing what incredible leukophobic propaganda passes for “education” in schools. I skimmed through my son’s 7th grade history/social studies book. As a history buff, I immediately spotted the absurd skewing of US history to present whites ,especially white males in the worst light and exaggerate or even fabricate the role of non-whites and white females in US history. It would have been laughable,if it wasn’t so sad. For example, the inside cover of the textbook had drawings of the faces of “famous” Americans. They had only 2 white males :Washington and Thomas Edison, but ridiculously included ” native Americans” blacks, hispanics, and women who did little or nothing important in our history. An example is Enrique De La Pena who “great” contribution to America was to write a personal diary about the battle of the Alamo. This person was included while Abraham Lincoln was not. When you combine miseducation which could also be called misinformation (as in giving enemy nations deliberately false information during war), the constant,relentless ridicule and demonization of white males on TV, and other misuses of mass media, the result is: states which are almost all white(Maine, NH, Montana) show Obama leading in recent presidential polls over a genuine war hero John McCain.I feel with the strong possibility of having the horror of an Obama presidency with possibly a veto proof congress will damage our country possibly beyond repair. We must do everything possible to erase leukophobia.Because conservatives are generally less outspoken, less willing to offend others, we are now at the edge of the precipice. We cannot worry whether we offend, whether we are called racist etc. We must all do everything we can to counteract the assault on the white male. We have produced 99% of everything of real value in the modern world We need to stamp out leukophobic myths such whites are solely responsible for slavery, blacks were terribly mistreated before the appearance of Saint MLK and the “Civil Rights” movements, white are totally responsible for the “genocide” of the so-called “native Americans”. I will very briefly give the real history which will dispel these myths. 1.According to black African scholars, whites never left the coast of Africa,sometimes not even leaving their ships. It was black Africans who were solely involved in every aspect of slavery up until the placement of slaves aboard the slave ships. 2. Compared to the amount of whites murdered by blacks each year since the 60’s, the amount of lynchings of black prior to the 1960s was miniscule. 3.Blacks didn’t suffer much discrimination in admissions to colleges. In the south, an entire system of colleges, medical and law schools were created with whites paying more than 90% of the cost prior to the Civil “Rights” movement. Given the difference in average IQ, few ,if any blacks would have qualified for admission to most medical and law schools. In the north prior to the 1960s, blacks who were QUALIFIED were admitted to medical , law and other professional schools, as well as prestigious universities. 4.There is now much evidence that caucasians were the first humans in the western hemisphere. A caucasian people ,the Anu were the original inhabitants of Japan but thru a real genocide there are very few ,if any full-blooded Anu left. The American Indians (I will never call them native Americans) were the aggressors in the first 2 encounters between Europeans and Indians in the new world, San Salvador Island (Columbus) and Newfoundland (Vikings). The Indians murdered all 40 Spainards left by Columbus on San Salvador while sailed back to Spain in late 1492. Until then, Columbus had treated the Indians relatively well. However, when he returned in 1493, and found all 40 of his crewmen murdered, he justifiably developed a hatred of Indians. We must properly educate whites to eradicate white guilt which will destroy us ,if we allow it.